Edge of Scotoma Sensitivity as a Microperimetry Clinical Trial End Point in USH2A Retinopathy

Microperimetry is commonly used to assess retinal function. We perform cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis on microperimetry parameters in retinopathy and explore end points suitable for future clinical trials. Microperimetry was performed using two grids, Grid 1 (18° diameter) and Grid 2 (6°...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational vision science & technology 2020-09, Vol.9 (10), p.9-9
Hauptverfasser: Charng, Jason, Lamey, Tina M, Thompson, Jennifer A, McLaren, Terri L, Attia, Mary S, McAllister, Ian L, Constable, Ian J, Mackey, David A, De Roach, John N, Chen, Fred K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Microperimetry is commonly used to assess retinal function. We perform cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis on microperimetry parameters in retinopathy and explore end points suitable for future clinical trials. Microperimetry was performed using two grids, Grid 1 (18° diameter) and Grid 2 (6° diameter). In Grid 1, four parameters (number of nonscotomatous loci, mean sensitivity [MS], responding point sensitivity [RPS], and edge of scotoma sensitivity [ESS]) were analyzed. In Grid 2, number of nonscotomatous loci and MS were examined. Interocular symmetry was also examined. Longitudinal analysis was conducted in a subset of eyes. Microperimetry could be performed in 16 of 21 patients. In Grid 1 ( = 15; average age, 35.6 years), average number of nonscotomatous loci, MS, RPS, and ESS were 46.6 loci, 10.0 dB, 14.7 and 9.6 dB, respectively. In Grid 2 ( = 13; average age, 37.4 years), 12 eyes had measurable sensitivity across the entire grid. Average MS was 23.8 dB. Interocular analysis revealed large 95% confidence intervals for all parameters. Longitudinally, Grid 1 ( = 12, average follow-up 2.6 years) ESS showed the fastest rate of decline (-1.84 dB/y) compared with MS (-0.34 dB/y) and RPS (-0.90 dB/y). Our data suggest that ESS may be more useful than MS and RPS in test grids that cover a large extent of the macula. We caution the use of contralateral eye as an internal control. ESS may decrease the duration or sample size of treatment trials in retinopathy.
ISSN:2164-2591
2164-2591
DOI:10.1167/tvst.9.10.9