The MEK inhibitor selumetinib reduces spinal neurofibroma burden in patients with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas

Abstract Background Spinal neurofibromas (SNFs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) can cause progressive spinal cord compression and neurological dysfunction. The MEK inhibitor selumetinib shrinks the majority of plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) in patients with NF1. We assessed the effect of selumetini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology advances 2020-01, Vol.2 (1), p.vdaa095-vdaa095
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Sadhana, Baker, Eva H, Gross, Andrea M, Whitcomb, Patricia, Baldwin, Andrea, Derdak, Joanne, Tibery, Cecilia, Desanto, Jennifer, Carbonell, Amanda, Yohay, Kaleb, O’Sullivan, Geraldine, Chen, Alice P, Widemann, Brigitte C, Dombi, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Spinal neurofibromas (SNFs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) can cause progressive spinal cord compression and neurological dysfunction. The MEK inhibitor selumetinib shrinks the majority of plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) in patients with NF1. We assessed the effect of selumetinib on SNF. Methods Pediatric and adult patients with NF1 and inoperable PN participating in phase 2 studies of selumetinib for PN were included in this analysis if they had SNF and serial spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Selumetinib was administered orally at the recommended dose of 25 mg/m2/dose twice daily (max 50 mg b.i.d.; 1 cycle = 28 days). We qualitatively assessed the effect of selumetinib on SNF-related spinal canal distortion, cerebrospinal fluid distribution, and spinal cord deformity on MRI. Results Twenty-four patients (18 male), median age 16.9 years (range, 6.2–60.3), had SNF, 22 of which were associated with the same nerves as the target PN assessed on the clinical trial. Twenty patients had spinal cord deformity. Twenty-three patients completed at least 12 treatment cycles to date. Eighteen patients showed subtle to a marked improvement in SNF burden, 5 remained stable, and no worsening was observed during treatment. Conclusions This is the first study describing the effect of selumetinib on SNF. Of 24 patients, 18 exhibited some improvement of SNF burden on imaging. These findings suggest that selumetinib may prevent the worsening of cord compression, potentially reducing the need for surgical interventions in select patients or benefitting patients who do not have a surgical option. Prospective evaluation of the clinical benefit of selumetinib for SNF is warranted.
ISSN:2632-2498
2632-2498
DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdaa095