Regional variations in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric atrophy and gastric cancer risk: The ENIGMA study in Chile

Background Regional variations in gastric cancer incidence are not explained by prevalence ofHelicobacter pylori, the main cause of the disease, with several areas presenting highH.pyloriprevalence but low gastric cancer incidence. The IARC worldwideH.pyloriprevalence surveys (ENIGMA) aim at systema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0237515, Article 0237515
Hauptverfasser: Herrero, Rolando, Heise, Katy, Acevedo, Johanna, Cook, Paz, Gonzalez, Claudia, Gahona, Jocelyne, Cortes, Raimundo, Collado, Luis, Beltran, Maria Enriqueta, Cikutovic, Marcos, Gonzalez, Paula, Murillo, Raul, Leja, Marcis, Megraud, Francis, Hernandez, Maria de la Luz, Barbier, Sylvaine, Park, Jin Young, Ferreccio, Catterina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Regional variations in gastric cancer incidence are not explained by prevalence ofHelicobacter pylori, the main cause of the disease, with several areas presenting highH.pyloriprevalence but low gastric cancer incidence. The IARC worldwideH.pyloriprevalence surveys (ENIGMA) aim at systematically describing age and sex-specific prevalence ofH.pyloriinfection around the world and generating hypotheses to explain regional variations in gastric cancer risk. Methods We selected age- and sex-stratified population samples in two areas with different gastric cancer incidence and mortality in Chile: Antofagasta (lower rate) and Valdivia (higher rate). Participants were 1-69 years old and provided interviews and blood for anti-H.pyloriantibodies (IgG, VacA, CagA, others) and atrophy biomarkers (pepsinogens). Results H.pyloriseroprevalence (Age-standardized to world population) and antibodies against CagA and VacA were similar in both sites.H.pyloriseroprevalence was 20% among children
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237515