Association of preoperative systemic Immune-inflammation Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index with survival in patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Background: Both systemic inflammation response and malnutrition are closely related to poor prognosis in patients with certain types of solid tumor. This study investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative combination of systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index (S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Cancer 2020-01, Vol.11 (19), p.5665-5677
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Yangqin, Yu, Dongdong, Yu, Zhixian, Zhao, Dewei, Chen, Yuming, Chen, Wu, Li, Yeping, Lin, Binwei, Gao, Xiaomin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Both systemic inflammation response and malnutrition are closely related to poor prognosis in patients with certain types of solid tumor. This study investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative combination of systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index (SII-PNI) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: The predictive ability of SII-PNI was developed and further validated in a cohort of 525 UTUC patients (253 in the training cohort and 272 in the validation cohort) who received RNU. Results: Survival analysis indicated that a SII ≥ 672.44 was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) while a PNI ≥ 47.83 was associated with better survival outcomes (All P-values < 0.05). The combination of simultaneously SII ≥ 672.44 and PNI < 47.83 was a powerful independent risk factor for OS, CSS, and RFS (P < 0.05). The SII-PNI had the largest area under the curve (AUC) compared to that for SII or PNI alone and other clinical factors, indicating its superior for predicting survival. In addition, the incorporation of the SII-PNI into established nomograms or current clinical parameters such as pathologic T stage and N stage, achieved higher c-indexes or larger AUC than without, indicating that adding SII-PNI helped predict prognosis. All results were found in the training cohort and confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: SII-PNI was a strong independent predictor of UTUC patients after RNU.
ISSN:1837-9664
1837-9664
DOI:10.7150/jca.44915