Implementation of a new Single-Pass Whole-Body Computed Tomography Protocol: Is it safe, effective and efficient in patients with severe trauma?

The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a new single-pass whole-body computed tomography Protocol in the management of patients with severe trauma. This was a descriptive evaluation of polytrauma patients who underwent whole-body computed tomography. Patients were divided i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) Colombia), 2020-03, Vol.51 (1), p.e4224
Hauptverfasser: Ordoñez, Carlos, García, Carlos, Parra, Michael W, Angamarca, Edison, Guzmán-Rodríguez, Mónica, Orlas, Claudia P, Herrera-Escobar, Juan Pablo, Rincón, Erika, Meléndez, Juan José, Serna, Jose Julián, Padilla, Natalia, Del Valle, Ana Milena, García, Alberto F, Holguín, Alfonso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a new single-pass whole-body computed tomography Protocol in the management of patients with severe trauma. This was a descriptive evaluation of polytrauma patients who underwent whole-body computed tomography. Patients were divided into three groups: 1. Blunt trauma hemodynamically stable 2. Blunt trauma hemodynamically unstable and 3. Penetrating trauma. Demographics, whole-body computed tomography parameters and outcome variables were evaluated. Were included 263 patients. Median injury severity score was 22 (IQR: 16-22). Time between arrival to the emergency department and completing the whole-body computed tomography was under 30 minutes in most patients [Group 1: 28 minutes (IQR: 14-55), Group 2: 29 minutes (IQR: 16-57), and Group 3: 31 minutes (IQR: 13-50; = 0.96)]. 172 patients (65.4%) underwent non-operative management. The calculated and the real survival rates did not vary among the groups either [Group 1: TRISS 86.4% vs. real survival rate 85% ( = 0.69); Group 2: TRISS 69% vs. real survival rate 74% ( = 0.25); Group 3: TRISS 93% vs. real survival rate 87% ( = 0.07)]. This new single-pass whole-body computed tomography protocol was safe, effective and efficient to decide whether the patient with severe trauma requires a surgical intervention independently of the mechanism of injury or the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Its use could also potentially reduce the rate of unnecessary surgical interventions of patients with severe trauma including those with penetrating trauma.
ISSN:0120-8322
1657-9534
DOI:10.25100/cm.v51i1.4224