Precise Species Identification for Enterobacter : a Genome Sequence-Based Study with Reporting of Two Novel Species, Enterobacter quasiroggenkampii sp. nov. and Enterobacter quasimori sp. nov
Enterobacter species are major human pathogens. Precise species identification lays a foundation for microbiology, but the taxonomy of Enterobacter is complicated and confusing. In this study, first, we significantly updated the taxonomy of Enterobacter by rigorous genome analyses and found that all...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | mSystems 2020-08, Vol.5 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Enterobacter
species are major human pathogens. Precise species identification lays a foundation for microbiology, but the taxonomy of
Enterobacter
is complicated and confusing. In this study, first, we significantly updated the taxonomy of
Enterobacter
by rigorous genome analyses and found that all subspecies assignments of
Enterobacter
were incorrect. Second, we characterized and reported two novel
Enterobacter
species with clinical significance. Third, we curated 1,997
Enterobacter
genome sequences deposited in GenBank and found that the species identification of most
Enterobacter
strains needed to be corrected. Fourth, we found that the most common
Enterobacter
species seen in clinical samples is
Enterobacter xiangfangensis
rather than
Enterobacter cloacae
. Fifth, we identified 14 tentative novel
Enterobacter
and 18 tentative novel non-
Enterobacter
species. This study highlights that updated and curated taxonomic assignments are the premise of correct species identification. We recommend that future
Enterobacter
studies need to use the updated taxonomy to avoid misleading information.
The genus
Enterobacter
comprises common pathogens and has a complicated taxonomy. Precise taxonomic assignation lays a foundation for microbiology. In this study, we updated the
Enterobacter
taxonomy based on robust genome analyses. We found that all
Enterobacter
subspecies assignments were incorrect.
Enterobacter cloacae
subsp.
dissolvens
and
Enterobacter hormaechei
subsp.
hoffmannii
are species (
Enterobacter dissolvens
and
Enterobacter hoffmannii
, respectively) rather than subspecies.
Enterobacter xiangfangensis
,
Enterobacter hormaechei
subsp.
oharae
, and
Enterobacter hormaechei
subsp.
steigerwaltii
are not
Enterobacter hormaechei
subspecies but belong to the same species (
Enterobacter xiangfangensis
).
Enterobacter timonensis
should be removed to
Pseudenterobacter
, a novel genus. We then reported two novel species,
Enterobacter quasiroggenkampii
and
Enterobacter quasimori
, by genome- and phenotype-based characterization. We also applied the updated taxonomy to curate 1,997
Enterobacter
genomes in GenBank. Species identification was changed following our updated taxonomy for the majority of publicly available strains (1,542, 77.2%). The most common
Enterobacter
species was
E. xiangfangensis
. We identified 14 novel tentative
Enterobacter
genomospecies. This study highlights that updated and curated taxonomic assignments are the premise of correct identification |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2379-5077 2379-5077 |
DOI: | 10.1128/mSystems.00527-20 |