Transarterial chemoembolization with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus S-1 for hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). S-1, a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug, has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2020-07, Vol.26 (27), p.3975-3988
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Jian-Hai, Liu, Shao-Xing, Gao, Song, Kou, Fu-Xin, Zhang, Xin, Wu, Di, Li, Xiao-Ting, Chen, Hui, Wang, Xiao-Dong, Liu, Peng, Zhang, Peng-Jun, Xu, Hai-Feng, Cao, Guang, Zhu, Lin-Zhong, Yang, Ren-Jie, Zhu, Xu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). S-1, a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug, has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite efficacy against advanced HCC. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by HAIC with or without oral S-1 for treating advanced HCC. In this single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 117 participants with advanced HCC were randomized to receive TACE followed by oxaliplatin-based HAIC either with (TACE/HAIC + S-1, = 56) or without (TACE/HAIC, = 61) oral S-1 between December 2013 and September 2017. Two participants were excluded from final analysis for withdrawing consent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety. In total, 115 participants (100 males and 15 females; mean age, 57.7 years ± 11.9) were analyzed. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 mo (0.4-58.6 mo) (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.82 to 6.18) 4.4 mo (1.1-54.4 mo) (95%CI: 2.54 to 6.26; = 0.585) and 8.4 mo (0.4-58.6 mo) (95%CI: 6.88 to 9.92) 8.3 mo (1.4-54.4 m) (95%CI: 5.71 to 10.96; = 0.985) in the TACE/HAIC + S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 30.9% 18.4% and 72.7% 56.7% in the TACE/HAIC + S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events had a similar frequency in both treatment groups. No improvements in tumor response rates, PFS or OS were observed with the addition of S-1 to TACE/HAIC in advanced HCC. Both treatment regimens had a similar safety profile.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3975