Prospective Assessment of an Automated Intraprocedural 12-Lead ECG-Based System for Localization of Early Left Ventricular Activation

BACKGROUNDTo facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG was developed. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess its accuracy. METHODSThe automate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology 2020-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e008262-e008262
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Shijie, AbdelWahab, Amir, Horáček, B. Milan, MacInnis, Paul J., Warren, James W., Davis, Jason S., Elsokkari, Ihab, Lee, David C., MacIntyre, Ciorsti J., Parkash, Ratika, Gray, Chris J., Gardner, Martin J., Marcoux, Curtis, Choudhury, Rajin, Trayanova, Natalia A., Sapp, John L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDTo facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG was developed. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess its accuracy. METHODSThe automated site of origin localization system consists of 3 steps: (1) localization of ventricular segment based on population templates, (2) population-based localization within a segment, and (3) patient-specific site localization. Localization error was assessed by the distance between the known reference site and the estimated site. RESULTSIn 19 patients undergoing 21 catheter ablation procedures of scar-related VT, site of origin localization accuracy was estimated using 552 left ventricular endocardial pacing sites pooled together and 25 VT-exit sites identified by contact mapping. For the 25 VT-exit sites, localization error of the population-based localization steps was within 10 mm. Patient-specific site localization achieved accuracy of within 3.5 mm after including up to 11 pacing (training) sites. Using 3 remotes (67.8±17.0 mm from the reference VT-exit site), and then 5 close pacing sites, resulted in localization error of 7.2±4.1 mm for the 25 identified VT-exit sites. In 2 emulated clinical procedure with 2 induced VTs, the site of origin localization system achieved accuracy within 4 mm. CONCLUSIONSIn this prospective validation study, the automated localization system achieved estimated accuracy within 10 mm and could thus provide clinical utility.
ISSN:1941-3084
1941-3149
1941-3084
DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008262