Long-term Paleolithic diet is associated with lower resistant starch intake, different gut microbiota composition and increased serum TMAO concentrations
Background The Paleolithic diet is promoted worldwide for improved gut health. However, there is little evidence available to support these claims, with existing literature examining anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. Objective To determine the association between dietary intake, markers o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nutrition 2020-08, Vol.59 (5), p.1845-1858 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The Paleolithic diet is promoted worldwide for improved gut health. However, there is little evidence available to support these claims, with existing literature examining anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes.
Objective
To determine the association between dietary intake, markers of colonic health, microbiota, and serum trimethylamine-
N
-oxide (TMAO), a gut-derived metabolite associated with cardiovascular disease.
Design
In a cross-sectional design, long-term (
n
= 44, > 1 year) self-reported followers of a Paleolithic diet (PD) and controls (
n
= 47) consuming a diet typical of national recommendations were recruited. Diets were assessed via 3-day weighed diet records; 48-h stool for short chain fatty acids using GC/MS, microbial composition via 16S rRNA sequencing of the V4 region using Illumina MiSeq. TMAO was quantified using LC–MS/MS.
Results
Participants were grouped according to PD adherence; namely excluding grains and dairy products. Strict Paleolithic (SP) (
n
= 22) and Pseudo-Paleolithic (PP) (
n
= 22) groups were formed. General linear modelling with age, gender, energy intake and body fat percentage as covariates assessed differences between groups. Intake of resistant starch was lower in both Paleolithic groups, compared to controls [2.62, 1.26 vs 4.48 g/day (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1436-6207 1436-6215 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00394-019-02036-y |