Different computed tomography patterns of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) between survivors and non-survivors

Different computed tomography patterns of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) between survivors and non-survivors

This study aimed to compare the chest computed tomography (CT) findings between survivors and non-survivors with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Between 12 January 2020 and 20 February 2020, the records of 124 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed and divide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-07, Vol.10 (1), p.11336, Article 11336
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Feng, Zheng, Chuansheng, Ye, Tianhe, Li, Lingli, Liu, Dehan, Li, Lin, Hesketh, Richard L., Yang, Lian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
692/699/255/2514
692/700/1421/1846/2771
Adult
Aged
Chest
Computed tomography
Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging
Coronavirus Infections - mortality
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease Progression
Female
Hospitalization
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging
Pneumonia, Viral - mortality
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Survivors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to compare the chest computed tomography (CT) findings between survivors and non-survivors with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Between 12 January 2020 and 20 February 2020, the records of 124 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into survivor (83/124) and non-survivor (41/124) groups. Chest CT findings were qualitatively compared on admission and serial chest CT scans were semi-quantitively evaluated between two groups using curve estimations. On admission, significantly more bilateral (97.6% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.001) and diffuse lesions (39.0% vs. 8.4%, p 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-68057-4