A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been shown to improve radiologists’ performance in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. This machine learning study develops a deep transfer learning computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) methodology to diagnose breast cancer using mpMRI. The retr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-06, Vol.10 (1), p.10536-10536, Article 10536
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Qiyuan, Whitney, Heather M., Giger, Maryellen L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been shown to improve radiologists’ performance in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. This machine learning study develops a deep transfer learning computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) methodology to diagnose breast cancer using mpMRI. The retrospective study included clinical MR images of 927 unique lesions from 616 women. Each MR study included a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI sequence and a T2-weighted (T2w) MRI sequence. A pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to extract features from the DCE and T2w sequences, and support vector machine classifiers were trained on the CNN features to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Three methods that integrate the sequences at different levels (image fusion, feature fusion, and classifier fusion) were investigated. Classification performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and compared using the DeLong test. The single-sequence classifiers yielded areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) [95% confidence intervals] of AUC DCE  = 0.85 [0.82, 0.88] and AUC T2w  = 0.78 [0.75, 0.81]. The multiparametric schemes yielded AUC ImageFusion  = 0.85 [0.82, 0.88], AUC FeatureFusion  = 0.87 [0.84, 0.89], and AUC ClassifierFusion  = 0.86 [0.83, 0.88]. The feature fusion method statistically significantly outperformed using DCE alone ( P  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-67441-4