Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study

Purpose Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. Methods Systematic review for evidence to provi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pituitary 2020-08, Vol.23 (4), p.417-429
Hauptverfasser: Pelsma, Iris C. M., Verstegen, Marco J. T., de Vries, Friso, Notting, Irene C., Broekman, Marike L. D., van Furth, Wouter R., Biermasz, Nienke R., Pereira, Alberto M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. Methods Systematic review for evidence to provide clinical guidance for timing of surgical decompression of the optic chiasm, and a cohort study of 30 NFMA patients, in whom mean deviation (MD), and severity of visual dysfunction was assessed. Results Systematic review 44 studies were included with a total of 4789 patients. Postoperatively, visual field defects improved in 87.0% of patients, stabilized in 12.8% and worsened in 1.0%. Specific protocols regarding timing of surgery were not reported. Only seven studies (16.7%) reported on either the duration of visual symptoms, or diagnostic, or treatment delay. Cohort study 30 NFMA patients (50% female, 60 eyes, mean age 58.5 ± 14.8 years), had a median MD of − 5.3 decibel (IQR − 3.1 to − 10.1). MD was strongly correlated with clinical severity (r =  − 0.94, P   − 2 dB, (2) mild − 2 dB to − 4 dB, (3) moderate − 4 to − 8 dB, (4) severe − 8 to − 17 dB, (5) very severe 
ISSN:1386-341X
1573-7403
DOI:10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0