Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTIONThe present study aimed to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn this 24-week, multicenter, open-label, random...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open diabetes research & care 2020-06, Vol.8 (1), p.e001115
Hauptverfasser: Wada, Eri, Onoue, Takeshi, Kobayashi, Tomoko, Handa, Tomoko, Hayase, Ayaka, Ito, Masaaki, Furukawa, Mariko, Okuji, Takayuki, Okada, Norio, Iwama, Shintaro, Sugiyama, Mariko, Tsunekawa, Taku, Takagi, Hiroshi, Hagiwara, Daisuke, Ito, Yoshihiro, Suga, Hidetaka, Banno, Ryoichi, Kuwatsuka, Yachiyo, Ando, Masahiko, Goto, Motomitsu, Arima, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:INTRODUCTIONThe present study aimed to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn this 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1), parallel-group study, patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes at five hospitals in Japan were randomly assigned to the FGM (n=49) or SMBG (n=51) groups and were provided each device for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and was compared using analysis of covariance model that included baseline values and group as covariates. RESULTSForty-eight participants in the FGM group and 45 in the SMBG group completed the study. The mean HbA1c levels were 7.83% (62.1 mmol/mol) in the FGM group and 7.84% (62.2 mmol/mol) in the SMBG group at baseline, and the values were reduced in both FGM (-0.43% (-4.7 mmol/mol), p
ISSN:2052-4897
2052-4897
DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001115