Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge

We have previously characterized the reproducibility of brain tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) using a dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging digital reference object across 12 sites using a range of imaging protocols and software platforms. As expected, reproducibilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tomography (Ann Arbor) 2020-06, Vol.6 (2), p.203-208
Hauptverfasser: Bell, Laura C, Semmineh, Natenael, An, Hongyu, Eldeniz, Cihat, Wahl, Richard, Schmainda, Kathleen M, Prah, Melissa A, Erickson, Bradley J, Korfiatis, Panagiotis, Wu, Chengyue, Sorace, Anna G, Yankeelov, Thomas E, Rutledge, Neal, Chenevert, Thomas L, Malyarenko, Dariya, Liu, Yichu, Brenner, Andrew, Hu, Leland S, Zhou, Yuxiang, Boxerman, Jerrold L, Yen, Yi-Fen, Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree, Beers, Andrew L, Muzi, Mark, Madhuranthakam, Ananth J, Pinho, Marco, Johnson, Brian, Quarles, C Chad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have previously characterized the reproducibility of brain tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) using a dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging digital reference object across 12 sites using a range of imaging protocols and software platforms. As expected, reproducibility was highest when imaging protocols and software were consistent, but decreased when they were variable. Our goal in this study was to determine the impact of rCBV reproducibility for tumor grade and treatment response classification. We found that varying imaging protocols and software platforms produced a range of optimal thresholds for both tumor grading and treatment response, but the performance of these thresholds was similar. These findings further underscore the importance of standardizing acquisition and analysis protocols across sites and software benchmarking.
ISSN:2379-139X
2379-1381
2379-139X
DOI:10.18383/j.tom.2020.00012