Potential of on‐scalp MEG: Robust detection of human visual gamma‐band responses
Electrophysiological signals recorded intracranially show rich frequency content spanning from near‐DC to hundreds of hertz. Noninvasive electromagnetic signals measured with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) typically contain less signal power in high frequencies than inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human brain mapping 2020-01, Vol.41 (1), p.150-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Electrophysiological signals recorded intracranially show rich frequency content spanning from near‐DC to hundreds of hertz. Noninvasive electromagnetic signals measured with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) typically contain less signal power in high frequencies than invasive recordings. Particularly, noninvasive detection of gamma‐band activity (>30 Hz) is challenging since coherently active source areas are small at such frequencies and the available imaging methods have limited spatial resolution. Compared to EEG and conventional SQUID‐based MEG, on‐scalp MEG should provide substantially improved spatial resolution, making it an attractive method for detecting gamma‐band activity. Using an on‐scalp array comprised of eight optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) and a conventional whole‐head SQUID array, we measured responses to a dynamic visual stimulus known to elicit strong gamma‐band responses. OPMs had substantially higher signal power than SQUIDs, and had a slightly larger relative gamma‐power increase over the baseline. With only eight OPMs, we could obtain gamma‐activity source estimates comparable to those of SQUIDs at the group level. Our results show the feasibility of OPMs to measure gamma‐band activity. To further facilitate the noninvasive detection of gamma‐band activity, the on‐scalp OPM arrays should be optimized with respect to sensor noise, the number of sensors and intersensor spacing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1065-9471 1097-0193 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hbm.24795 |