Prognostic significance of E-cadherin expression in prostatic carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Increasing studies were performed to explore the prognostic value of E-cadherin in prostatic carcinoma, however, with inconsistent results. Hence, this systematic review is aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of E-cadherin in patients with prostatic carcinoma (PCa). A comprehensive literature sear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2020-04, Vol.99 (15), p.e19707-e19707
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Xiwen, Zhang, Zhenhua, Chen, Shuntai, Jiang, Juling, Qi, Runzhi, Mi, Xue, Zhang, Xing, Xi, Yupeng, Zheng, Honggang, Hua, Baojin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increasing studies were performed to explore the prognostic value of E-cadherin in prostatic carcinoma, however, with inconsistent results. Hence, this systematic review is aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of E-cadherin in patients with prostatic carcinoma (PCa). A comprehensive literature search in all available databases will be conducted to identify eligible studies. We will employ hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to estimate the correlations between E-cadherin expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and clinicopathological features. Meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager (Revman) 5.3.5 software (Cochrane Community, London, United Kingdom) and STATA 14 software (version 14.0; Stata Corp, College Station, TX). This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of the correlations between snail expression and OS, DFS/RFS, PFS and clinicopathological features. The study will provide updated evidence to assess whether the expression of E-cadherin is in association with poor prognosis in patients with PCa. It is not necessary for ethical approval because individuals cannot be identified. The protocol will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or presented at a relevant conference. This systematic review protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO network (No. CRD42019128353).
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019707