Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols were developed for colorectal surgery to hasten postoperative recovery. Variations of the protocol are being adopted for gynecological procedures despite limited population and procedure-specific outcome data. Our objective was to evaluate whether implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway would facilitate reduced length of admission in a urogynecology population. In this retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pelvic floor reconstructive surgery by 7 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons, we compared same-day discharge, length of admission and postoperative complications before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway at a tertiary care hospital. Groups were compared using χ2 and Student t tests. Candidate variables that could have an impact on patient outcomes with P < .2 were included in multivariable logistic regression models. Satisfaction with surgical experience was assessed using a phone-administered questionnaire the day after discharge. Mean age and body mass index of 258 women (137 before enhanced recovery after surgery and 121 enhanced recovery after surgery) were 65.5 ± 11.3 years and 28.2 ± 5.0 kg/m2. The most common diagnosis was pelvic organ prolapse (n = 242, 93.8%) including stage III pelvic organ prolapse (n = 61, 65.1%). Apical suspension procedures included 58 transvaginal (25.1%), 112 laparoscopic/robotic (48.8%), and 61 obliterative (26.4%). Hysterectomy was performed in 57.4% of women. Demographic and surgical procedures were similar in both groups. Compared with before enhanced recovery after surgery, the enhanced recovery after surgery group had a higher proportion of same-day discharge (25.9% vs 91.7%, P < .001) and a 13.8 hour shorter duration of stay (25.9 ± 13.5 vs 12.1 ± 11.2 hours, P