SUN-611 Impact of Existing Heart Failure on Outcomes of Hospitalization of Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State. From the National Inpatient Sample
Introduction: Patients with underlying heart failure (HF) are at increased risk for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS). However, no studies have investigated whether the presence of existing HF would impact the outcomes of HHS. Objective: we aimed to study the impact of heart HF on outcomes of H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Endocrine Society 2020-05, Vol.4 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: Patients with underlying heart failure (HF) are at increased risk for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS). However, no studies have investigated whether the presence of existing HF would impact the outcomes of HHS. Objective: we aimed to study the impact of heart HF on outcomes of HHS among adult patients hospitalized for HHS. Methodology: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for all patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state during the years 2005-2014. The primary outcomes of the study were all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute stroke. The secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), rhabdomyolysis, acute respiratory failure (ARF), need for mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay (LOS), and total cost of stay. Results: Overall, 188,725 patients were admitted for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Mean age was 55.9 (SEM: 0.1). Females were (43.9%), Caucasians were 37.4% while African American were 35.2%. Total mortality was 1.1%, MI was 1.3% and stroke was 1.1%. Most common secondary outcome was AKI seen in 31.3% followed by ARF seen in 2.9% of total. The mean cost was 7887 $ (SEM: 84.6) and mean LOS was 4.1 days (SEM: 0.03). Patients with heart failure had higher rates for mortality 2% vs 0.9%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2472-1972 2472-1972 |
DOI: | 10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.748 |