SUN-542 The Effect of Energy Deprivation on Metabolic Hormone Responses to Meals
Background: Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has recently gained popularity as a weight-loss strategy; however, fasting metabolic hormones and dynamic meal-related responses, are not well-established in this setting. Methods: We measured metabolic hormone responses to 5-days of neutral or decr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Endocrine Society 2020-05, Vol.4 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has recently gained popularity as a weight-loss strategy; however, fasting metabolic hormones and dynamic meal-related responses, are not well-established in this setting. Methods: We measured metabolic hormone responses to 5-days of neutral or decreased energy availability (NEA, 45 kcal/kg LBM*d vs DEA, 20 kcal/kg LBM*d) in the early follicular phase (EFP) in 19 regularly-cycling, sedentary, women (age 23.36± 2.08 yr; mean±SD). Hunger was assessed using a visual analogue scale on the 5th day of each condition. Scheduled breakfast and lunch were administered according to assigned caloric intake, while an afternoon snack based on NEA was provided on both occasions. Blood was sampled for leptin, insulin, glucose, and GH at 10-min intervals and cortisol was measured at 30-min intervals over eight hours starting at 0800 h, while Orexin A and adiponectin were measured in fasting samples. AUC for each hormone for every meal and diet condition were analyzed using linear mixed models. Insulin and insulin/glucose ratio (I/G) were also adjusted for meal calories. Percentage body fat mass was measured every visit using air displacement plethysmography (BodPod®). Results are presented as least square mean ± sem. Results: There were no differences in body mass index or % fat mass after NEA vs DEA although there was a significant increase in hunger with DEA (p=0.002). Fasting levels of glucose and insulin were unchanged while leptin decreased with DEA (1.27±0.07 and 1.04±0.07 ng/mL, NEA and DEA respectively; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2472-1972 2472-1972 |
DOI: | 10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1468 |