Infant Cranial Deformity: Cranial Helmet Therapy or Physiotherapy?

: To compare cranial helmet therapy (CHT) and physiotherapy (PT) for the effective treatment of positional plagiocephaly in infants in terms of improving functional recovery. This was a prospective cohort study involving 48 infants between 5-10 months of age with cranial deformities. The Cranial Vau...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-04, Vol.17 (7), p.2612
Hauptverfasser: González-Santos, Josefa, González-Bernal, Jerónimo J, De-la-Fuente Anuncibay, Raquel, Soto-Cámara, Raúl, Cubo, Esther, Aguilar-Parra, José M, Trigueros, Rubén, López-Liria, Remedios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:: To compare cranial helmet therapy (CHT) and physiotherapy (PT) for the effective treatment of positional plagiocephaly in infants in terms of improving functional recovery. This was a prospective cohort study involving 48 infants between 5-10 months of age with cranial deformities. The Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) and the Brunet-Lezine scale were calculated at the initiation of the study and after 40 treatment sessions. : The infants' first assessment showed a delay in overall development areas with a global developmental quotient (DQ) (posture, coordination, sociability, and language) of 80.15. Although developmental improvements were observed in both groups in the Brunet-Lezine scale after treatment, the MANCOVA test showed no significant differences (F(5) = 0.82, = 0.506, eta = 0.09). The CVAI reduced to 4.07% during the final evaluation in the cranial helmet group and 5.85% in the physiotherapy group without any significant differences between the two therapies ( = 0.70). : No statistically significant differences were found between CHT and PT. After treatment, improvements from baseline measurements were observed in each of the readings of cranial deformity.
ISSN:1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph17072612