Prognostic impact of interim positron emission tomography in mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with frontline R‐CHOP

Summary Although 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F‐FDG PET) is commonly used for initial staging and therapeutic response evaluation in aggressive lymphomas, its prognostic utility for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the cor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2020-03, Vol.188 (6), p.860-871
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, Young‐Woo, O, Joo‐Hyun, Park, Kyung‐Sin, Min, Gi June, Park, Sung‐Soo, Yoon, Jae‐Ho, Eom, Ki‐Seong, Min, Chang‐Ki, Cho, Seok‐Goo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Although 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F‐FDG PET) is commonly used for initial staging and therapeutic response evaluation in aggressive lymphomas, its prognostic utility for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the correlations of interim PET (iPET) and end‐of‐treatment PET (ePET) response with survival outcomes in 89 consecutive advanced MCL patients treated with frontline R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone). iPET positivity was strongly associated with inferior five‐year overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 7·84, P 
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.16257