Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials
In lumbar fusion surgery, intervertebral spacer cages made of silicon nitride (Si N ) ceramic are an available option among other biomaterials. While the surface chemistry of Si N is known to favor bone fusion, large-scale clinical studies attesting to its efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) 2020-03, Vol.6 (1), p.33-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In lumbar fusion surgery, intervertebral spacer cages made of silicon nitride (Si
N
) ceramic are an available option among other biomaterials. While the surface chemistry of Si
N
is known to favor bone fusion, large-scale clinical studies attesting to its efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retrospective study compared lumbar fusion outcomes for Si
N
cages to previously reported data for other cage materials.
Pre-operative patient demographics, comorbidities, changes in visual analog scale (ΔVAS) pain scores, complications, adverse events, and secondary surgical interventions (SSI) were compiled from the records of 450 patients who underwent Si
N
lumbar spinal fusion at four separate U.S. surgical centers. For comparison, MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar searches identified studies reporting similar outcomes for other biomaterials. A total of 1,025 patients from 26 cohorts reported in 14 publications met inclusion criteria for this control group.
Overall, the mean last-follow-up for all patients was 341±293 days (11.4±9.8 months), with the longest follow-up being 6.4 years. Patients with Si
N
implants were similar in gender and age distribution to the control group but had higher BMI values (30.9±6.1
. 25.8±4.1, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2414-469X 2414-4630 |
DOI: | 10.21037/jss.2019.12.11 |