Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR

► Developed multiplex RT PCR that detects 18 respiratory viruses in clinical samples. ► Developed method is rapid, cost effective, highly sensitive and specific. ► Sensitivity and specificity of multiplex RT PCR were 99.54 and 83.66% respectively. ► This method is useful for surveillance and diagnos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of virological methods 2013-04, Vol.189 (1), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Choudhary, Manohar L., Anand, Siddharth P., Heydari, Mostafa, Rane, Grishma, Potdar, Varsha A., Chadha, Mandeep S., Mishra, Akhilesh C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Developed multiplex RT PCR that detects 18 respiratory viruses in clinical samples. ► Developed method is rapid, cost effective, highly sensitive and specific. ► Sensitivity and specificity of multiplex RT PCR were 99.54 and 83.66% respectively. ► This method is useful for surveillance and diagnosis in resource-poor settings. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and specificity. Clinical specimens from 843 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms were used in the study. 503 (59.7%) samples were detected positive by mRT-PCR. Of these 462 (54.8%) exhibited presence of a single pathogen and 41 (4.9%) had multiple pathogens. rRT-PCR detected 439 (52.1%) positive samples, where 419 (49.7%) exhibited one virus and 20 (2.4%) showed co-infections. Concordance between mRT-PCR and rRT-PCR was 91.9% and kappa correlation 0.837. Sensitivity and specificity of mRT-PCR were 99.5% and 83.7% while that of rRT-PCR was 86.9% and 99.4% respectively. Rhinovirus (17.2%) was the most frequently detected virus followed by respiratory syncytial virus B (15.4%), H1N1pdm09 (8.54%), parainfluenza virus-3 (5.8%) and metapneumovirus (5.2%). In conclusion, mRT-PCR is a rapid, cost effective, specific and highly sensitive method for detection of respiratory viruses.
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017