Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals

1 Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and 2 Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008 We used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2008-04, Vol.99 (4), p.1928-1941
Hauptverfasser: Nelken, Israel, Bizley, Jennifer K, Nodal, Fernando R, Ahmed, Bashir, King, Andrew J, Schnupp, Jan W. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1941
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1928
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 99
creator Nelken, Israel
Bizley, Jennifer K
Nodal, Fernando R
Ahmed, Bashir
King, Andrew J
Schnupp, Jan W. H
description 1 Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and 2 Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008 We used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to study the large-scale organization of ferret auditory cortex in response to complex sounds. Cortical responses were collected during continuous stimulation by sequences of sounds with varying frequency, period, or interaural level differences. We used a set of stimuli that differ in spectral structure, but have the same periodicity and therefore evoke the same pitch percept (click trains, sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, and iterated ripple noise). These stimuli failed to reveal a consistent periodotopic map across the auditory fields imaged. Rather, gradients of period sensitivity differed for the different types of periodic stimuli. Binaural interactions were studied both with single contralateral, ipsilateral, and diotic broadband noise bursts and with sequences of broadband noise bursts with varying level presented contralaterally, ipsilaterally, or in opposite phase to both ears. Contralateral responses were generally largest and ipsilateral responses were smallest when using single noise bursts, but the extent of the activated area was large and comparable in all three aural configurations. Modulating the amplitude in counter phase to the two ears generally produced weaker modulation of the optical signals than the modulation produced by the monaural stimuli. These results suggest that binaural interactions seen in cortex are most likely predominantly due to subcortical processing. Thus our optical imaging data do not support the theory that the primary or nonprimary cortical fields imaged are topographically organized to form consistent maps of systematically varying sensitivity either to stimulus pitch or to simple binaural properties of the acoustic stimuli. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Nelken, Dept. of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91104, Israel (E-mail: israel{at}cc.huji.ac.il )
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00469.2007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7116535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20666886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-4e04b1c34a11250fb0068e9618c509fb00e2375d68f5df05595101aee02fa4483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EYsvCkSvyCU4pYydObA5Iq4rCSitV2o-z5SZO6sqxs7GzbPnrcWi1wAFxmjf2b57Gfgi9JbAkhNGPe7cEKEqxpADVM7RIZzQjTPDnaAGQdA5VdYZehbCHRDCgL9EZ4bSinMMC3V_rMHgXdMC-xRdTY6IfD3jlx6gfcfRJ9YNN8iaafrLmE15Pro7GO2XxZuyUMz_U3OJr_aCV1Q2-C8Z1-NLF0bhgarwZoqkTfWO6NBReoxdtKvrNqZ6ju_WX29W37Grz9XJ1cZXVhaAxKzQUW1LnhSKEMmi3ACXXoiS8ZiDmVtO8Yk3JW9a0wJhgBIjSGmirioLn5-jz0XeYtr1uap0WUlYOo-nVeJBeGfn3jTM72fkHWRFSspwlg_cng9HfTzpE2ZtQa2uV034KsoKCi5yJ_4IUyrLkvExgdgTr0Ycw6vZpGwJyTlPunfyVppzTTPy7P5_wmz7Fl4APR2Bnut13M2o57A7BeOu7w-wlhCwkEXT-jfzf5Hqy9lY_xjTyNCGHps1_Av7OvUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20666886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nelken, Israel ; Bizley, Jennifer K ; Nodal, Fernando R ; Ahmed, Bashir ; King, Andrew J ; Schnupp, Jan W. H</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelken, Israel ; Bizley, Jennifer K ; Nodal, Fernando R ; Ahmed, Bashir ; King, Andrew J ; Schnupp, Jan W. H</creatorcontrib><description>1 Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and 2 Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008 We used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to study the large-scale organization of ferret auditory cortex in response to complex sounds. Cortical responses were collected during continuous stimulation by sequences of sounds with varying frequency, period, or interaural level differences. We used a set of stimuli that differ in spectral structure, but have the same periodicity and therefore evoke the same pitch percept (click trains, sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, and iterated ripple noise). These stimuli failed to reveal a consistent periodotopic map across the auditory fields imaged. Rather, gradients of period sensitivity differed for the different types of periodic stimuli. Binaural interactions were studied both with single contralateral, ipsilateral, and diotic broadband noise bursts and with sequences of broadband noise bursts with varying level presented contralaterally, ipsilaterally, or in opposite phase to both ears. Contralateral responses were generally largest and ipsilateral responses were smallest when using single noise bursts, but the extent of the activated area was large and comparable in all three aural configurations. Modulating the amplitude in counter phase to the two ears generally produced weaker modulation of the optical signals than the modulation produced by the monaural stimuli. These results suggest that binaural interactions seen in cortex are most likely predominantly due to subcortical processing. Thus our optical imaging data do not support the theory that the primary or nonprimary cortical fields imaged are topographically organized to form consistent maps of systematically varying sensitivity either to stimulus pitch or to simple binaural properties of the acoustic stimuli. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Nelken, Dept. of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91104, Israel (E-mail: israel{at}cc.huji.ac.il )</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00469.2007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18272880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Auditory Cortex - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Female ; Ferrets ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Linear Models ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Mustela putorius furo ; Temporal Lobe - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2008-04, Vol.99 (4), p.1928-1941</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-4e04b1c34a11250fb0068e9618c509fb00e2375d68f5df05595101aee02fa4483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-4e04b1c34a11250fb0068e9618c509fb00e2375d68f5df05595101aee02fa4483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3025,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18272880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelken, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizley, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nodal, Fernando R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Bashir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnupp, Jan W. H</creatorcontrib><title>Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>1 Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and 2 Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008 We used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to study the large-scale organization of ferret auditory cortex in response to complex sounds. Cortical responses were collected during continuous stimulation by sequences of sounds with varying frequency, period, or interaural level differences. We used a set of stimuli that differ in spectral structure, but have the same periodicity and therefore evoke the same pitch percept (click trains, sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, and iterated ripple noise). These stimuli failed to reveal a consistent periodotopic map across the auditory fields imaged. Rather, gradients of period sensitivity differed for the different types of periodic stimuli. Binaural interactions were studied both with single contralateral, ipsilateral, and diotic broadband noise bursts and with sequences of broadband noise bursts with varying level presented contralaterally, ipsilaterally, or in opposite phase to both ears. Contralateral responses were generally largest and ipsilateral responses were smallest when using single noise bursts, but the extent of the activated area was large and comparable in all three aural configurations. Modulating the amplitude in counter phase to the two ears generally produced weaker modulation of the optical signals than the modulation produced by the monaural stimuli. These results suggest that binaural interactions seen in cortex are most likely predominantly due to subcortical processing. Thus our optical imaging data do not support the theory that the primary or nonprimary cortical fields imaged are topographically organized to form consistent maps of systematically varying sensitivity either to stimulus pitch or to simple binaural properties of the acoustic stimuli. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Nelken, Dept. of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91104, Israel (E-mail: israel{at}cc.huji.ac.il )</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ferrets</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Mustela putorius furo</subject><subject>Temporal Lobe - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EYsvCkSvyCU4pYydObA5Iq4rCSitV2o-z5SZO6sqxs7GzbPnrcWi1wAFxmjf2b57Gfgi9JbAkhNGPe7cEKEqxpADVM7RIZzQjTPDnaAGQdA5VdYZehbCHRDCgL9EZ4bSinMMC3V_rMHgXdMC-xRdTY6IfD3jlx6gfcfRJ9YNN8iaafrLmE15Pro7GO2XxZuyUMz_U3OJr_aCV1Q2-C8Z1-NLF0bhgarwZoqkTfWO6NBReoxdtKvrNqZ6ju_WX29W37Grz9XJ1cZXVhaAxKzQUW1LnhSKEMmi3ACXXoiS8ZiDmVtO8Yk3JW9a0wJhgBIjSGmirioLn5-jz0XeYtr1uap0WUlYOo-nVeJBeGfn3jTM72fkHWRFSspwlg_cng9HfTzpE2ZtQa2uV034KsoKCi5yJ_4IUyrLkvExgdgTr0Ycw6vZpGwJyTlPunfyVppzTTPy7P5_wmz7Fl4APR2Bnut13M2o57A7BeOu7w-wlhCwkEXT-jfzf5Hqy9lY_xjTyNCGHps1_Av7OvUQ</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Nelken, Israel</creator><creator>Bizley, Jennifer K</creator><creator>Nodal, Fernando R</creator><creator>Ahmed, Bashir</creator><creator>King, Andrew J</creator><creator>Schnupp, Jan W. H</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals</title><author>Nelken, Israel ; Bizley, Jennifer K ; Nodal, Fernando R ; Ahmed, Bashir ; King, Andrew J ; Schnupp, Jan W. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-4e04b1c34a11250fb0068e9618c509fb00e2375d68f5df05595101aee02fa4483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ferrets</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Mustela putorius furo</topic><topic>Temporal Lobe - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelken, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizley, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nodal, Fernando R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Bashir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnupp, Jan W. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelken, Israel</au><au>Bizley, Jennifer K</au><au>Nodal, Fernando R</au><au>Ahmed, Bashir</au><au>King, Andrew J</au><au>Schnupp, Jan W. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1928</spage><epage>1941</epage><pages>1928-1941</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>1 Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and 2 Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008 We used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to study the large-scale organization of ferret auditory cortex in response to complex sounds. Cortical responses were collected during continuous stimulation by sequences of sounds with varying frequency, period, or interaural level differences. We used a set of stimuli that differ in spectral structure, but have the same periodicity and therefore evoke the same pitch percept (click trains, sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, and iterated ripple noise). These stimuli failed to reveal a consistent periodotopic map across the auditory fields imaged. Rather, gradients of period sensitivity differed for the different types of periodic stimuli. Binaural interactions were studied both with single contralateral, ipsilateral, and diotic broadband noise bursts and with sequences of broadband noise bursts with varying level presented contralaterally, ipsilaterally, or in opposite phase to both ears. Contralateral responses were generally largest and ipsilateral responses were smallest when using single noise bursts, but the extent of the activated area was large and comparable in all three aural configurations. Modulating the amplitude in counter phase to the two ears generally produced weaker modulation of the optical signals than the modulation produced by the monaural stimuli. These results suggest that binaural interactions seen in cortex are most likely predominantly due to subcortical processing. Thus our optical imaging data do not support the theory that the primary or nonprimary cortical fields imaged are topographically organized to form consistent maps of systematically varying sensitivity either to stimulus pitch or to simple binaural properties of the acoustic stimuli. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Nelken, Dept. of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91104, Israel (E-mail: israel{at}cc.huji.ac.il )</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>18272880</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00469.2007</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2008-04, Vol.99 (4), p.1928-1941
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7116535
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Algorithms
Animals
Auditory Cortex - physiology
Brain Mapping
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Electrocardiography
Electrodes, Implanted
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Female
Ferrets
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Linear Models
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Mustela putorius furo
Temporal Lobe - physiology
title Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20of%20Auditory%20Cortex%20to%20Complex%20Stimuli:%20Functional%20Organization%20Revealed%20Using%20Intrinsic%20Optical%20Signals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Nelken,%20Israel&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1928&rft.epage=1941&rft.pages=1928-1941&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00469.2007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20666886%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20666886&rft_id=info:pmid/18272880&rfr_iscdi=true