A relevance and quality-based ranking algorithm applied to evidence-based medicine

•A mechanism to measure the quality of documents according to Evidence-based Medicine.•A mechanism for ranking documents based on relevance and quality is presented•Experiments with real databases are presented The amount of information available about millions of different subjects is growing every...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2020-07, Vol.191, p.105415-105415, Article 105415
Hauptverfasser: Serrano-Guerrero, Jesus, Romero, Francisco P., Olivas, Jose A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A mechanism to measure the quality of documents according to Evidence-based Medicine.•A mechanism for ranking documents based on relevance and quality is presented•Experiments with real databases are presented The amount of information available about millions of different subjects is growing every day. This has led to the birth of new search tools specialized in different domains, because classical information retrieval models have trouble dealing with the special characteristics of some of these domains. Evidence-based Medicine is a case of a complex domain where classical information retrieval models can help search engines retrieve documents by considering the presence or absence of terms, but these must be complemented with other specific strategies which allow retrieving and ranking documents including the best current evidence and methodological quality. The goal is to present a ranking algorithm able to select the best documents for clinicians considering aspects related to the relevance and the quality of said documents. In order to assess the effectiveness of this proposal, an experimental methodology has been followed by using Medline as a data set and the Cochrane Library as a gold standard. Applying the evaluation methodology proposed, and after submitting 40 queries on the platform developed, the MAP (Mean Average Precision) obtained was 20.26%. Successful results have been achieved with the experiments, improving on other studies, but under different and even more complex circumstances.
ISSN:0169-2607
1872-7565
DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105415