Comparison of the AdvanSure™ real-time RT-PCR and Seeplex® RV12 ACE assay for the detection of respiratory viruses
•Analytical performance was examined using consecutive clinical specimens.•The AdvanSure assay required less hands-on and turnaround times than the Seeplex assay.•The results of respiratory viruses detection were comparable in both assays.•The AdvanSure assay showed a higher concordance with monople...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of virological methods 2015-11, Vol.224, p.42-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Analytical performance was examined using consecutive clinical specimens.•The AdvanSure assay required less hands-on and turnaround times than the Seeplex assay.•The results of respiratory viruses detection were comparable in both assays.•The AdvanSure assay showed a higher concordance with monoplex PCR and sequencing.
The AdvanSure™ RV real-time PCR kit (AdvanSure; LG Life Sciences, Korea) is based on multiplex real-time PCR and can simultaneously detect 14 respiratory viruses. We compared the performance of the AdvanSure assay with the Seeplex RV 12 ACE detection kit (Seeplex; Seegene, Seoul, South Korea), a multiplex end-point PCR assay. A total of 454 consecutive respiratory specimens were tested with both AdvanSure and Seeplex assays; AdvanSure detected 153 (33.7%) positive cases and Seeplex detected 145 (31.9%) positive cases. The positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and kappa value for the two assays were 87.2% (95% CI, 80.3–92.1), 91.1% (95% CI, 87.2–93.9), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.70–0.83), respectively. Compared with the Seeplex assay, the AdvanSure assay had a shorter turnaround time (3h vs. 8h) and a shorter hands-on time ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0166-0934 1879-0984 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.08.003 |