Age dependence of modern clinical risk groups for localized prostate cancer—A population‐based study
Background Optimal prostate cancer (PCa) screening strategies will focus on men likely to have potentially lethal disease. Age‐specific incidence rates (ASIRs) by modern clinical risk groups could inform risk stratification efforts for screening. Methods This cross‐sectional population study identif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2020-04, Vol.126 (8), p.1691-1699 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Optimal prostate cancer (PCa) screening strategies will focus on men likely to have potentially lethal disease. Age‐specific incidence rates (ASIRs) by modern clinical risk groups could inform risk stratification efforts for screening.
Methods
This cross‐sectional population study identified all men diagnosed with PCa in Norway from 2014 to 2017 (n = 20,356). Age, Gleason score (primary plus secondary), and clinical stage were extracted. Patients were assigned to clinical risk groups: low, favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, high, regional, and metastatic. Chi‐square tests analyzed the independence of Gleason scores and modern PCa risk groups with age. ASIRs for each risk group were calculated as the product of Norwegian ASIRs for all PCa and the proportions observed for each risk category.
Results
Older age was significantly associated with a higher Gleason score and more advanced disease. The percentages of men with Gleason 8 to 10 disease among men aged 55 to 59, 65 to 69, 75 to 79, and 85 to 89 years were 16.5%, 23.4%, 37.2%, and 59.9%, respectively (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cncr.32702 |