Age dependence of modern clinical risk groups for localized prostate cancer—A population‐based study

Background Optimal prostate cancer (PCa) screening strategies will focus on men likely to have potentially lethal disease. Age‐specific incidence rates (ASIRs) by modern clinical risk groups could inform risk stratification efforts for screening. Methods This cross‐sectional population study identif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2020-04, Vol.126 (8), p.1691-1699
Hauptverfasser: Huynh‐Le, Minh‐Phuong, Myklebust, Tor Åge, Feng, Christine H., Karunamuni, Roshan, Johannesen, Tom Børge, Dale, Anders M., Andreassen, Ole A., Seibert, Tyler M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Optimal prostate cancer (PCa) screening strategies will focus on men likely to have potentially lethal disease. Age‐specific incidence rates (ASIRs) by modern clinical risk groups could inform risk stratification efforts for screening. Methods This cross‐sectional population study identified all men diagnosed with PCa in Norway from 2014 to 2017 (n = 20,356). Age, Gleason score (primary plus secondary), and clinical stage were extracted. Patients were assigned to clinical risk groups: low, favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, high, regional, and metastatic. Chi‐square tests analyzed the independence of Gleason scores and modern PCa risk groups with age. ASIRs for each risk group were calculated as the product of Norwegian ASIRs for all PCa and the proportions observed for each risk category. Results Older age was significantly associated with a higher Gleason score and more advanced disease. The percentages of men with Gleason 8 to 10 disease among men aged 55 to 59, 65 to 69, 75 to 79, and 85 to 89 years were 16.5%, 23.4%, 37.2%, and 59.9%, respectively (P 
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.32702