Optical coherence tomography angiography as a novel approach to contactless evaluation of sublingual microcirculation: A proof of principle study

Microcirculatory disorders are crucial in pathophysiology of organ dysfunction in critical illness. Evaluation of sublingual microcirculation is not routinely conducted in daily practice due to time-consuming analysis and susceptibility to artifacts. We investigated the suitability of optical cohere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-03, Vol.10 (1), p.5408-5408, Article 5408
Hauptverfasser: Hessler, Michael, Nelis, Pieter, Ertmer, Christian, Alnawaiseh, Maged, Lehmann, Florian, Schmidt, Christina, Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald, Rehberg, Sebastian Willy, Arnemann, Philip-Helge, Rovas, Alexandros
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Microcirculatory disorders are crucial in pathophysiology of organ dysfunction in critical illness. Evaluation of sublingual microcirculation is not routinely conducted in daily practice due to time-consuming analysis and susceptibility to artifacts. We investigated the suitability of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for contactless evaluation of sublingual microcirculation. Sublingual microcirculation was imaged in 10 healthy volunteers, using an OCTA device and an incident dark field (IDF) illumination microscopy (current gold standard). OCTA images were analyzed with regard to flow density and perfused vessel density (PVD byOCTA ). IDF videos were analyzed following current recommendations. Flow density was automatically extracted from OCTA images (whole en face 48.9% [43.2; 54.5]; central ring 52.6% [43.6; 60.6]). PVD byOCTA did not differ from the PVD calculated from IDF videos (PVD byOCTA 18.6 mm/mm² [18.0; 21.7]) vs. PVD byIDF 21.0 mm/mm² [17.5; 22.9]; p = 0.430). Analysis according to Bland-Altman revealed a mean bias of 0.95 mm/mm² (95% Confidence interval −1.34 to 3.25) between PVD byOCTA and PVD byIDF with limits of agreement of −5.34 to 7.24 mm/mm². This study is the first to demonstrate the suitability of OCTA for evaluating sublingual microcirculation. Comparison of the perfused vessel density between methods showed a plausible level of agreement.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-62128-2