Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer

Objective This study was conducted in order to determine the optimal timing of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. Methods Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-04, Vol.30 (4), p.1896-1907
Hauptverfasser: Borggreve, Alicia S., Heethuis, Sophie E., Boekhoff, Mick R., Goense, Lucas, van Rossum, Peter S. N., Brosens, Lodewijk A. A., van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W., van Hillegersberg, Richard, Lagendijk, Jan J. W., Mook, Stella, Ruurda, Jelle P., Meijer, Gert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective This study was conducted in order to determine the optimal timing of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. Methods Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who planned to undergo nCRT followed by surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients underwent six DW-MRI scans: one baseline scan before the start of nCRT and weekly scans during 5 weeks of nCRT. Relative changes in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the baseline scans and the scans during nCRT (ΔADC(%)) were compared between pathologic complete responders (pCR) and non-pCR (tumor regression grades 2–5). The discriminative ability of ΔADC(%) was determined based on the c -statistic. Results A total of 24 patients with 142 DW-MRI scans were included. pCR was observed in seven patients (29%). ΔADC(%) from baseline to week 2 was significantly higher in patients with pCR versus non-pCR (median [IQR], 36% [30%, 41%] for pCR versus 16% [14%, 29%] for non-pCR, p = 0.004). The ΔADC(%) of the second week in combination with histology resulted in the highest c -statistic for the prediction of pCR versus non-pCR (0.87). The c -statistic of this model increased to 0.97 after additional exclusion of patients with a small tumor volume (
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06513-0