CYP2D6 Genotype-Guided Tamoxifen Dosing in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (TARGET-1): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study
In patients taking tamoxifen, the genotype causes different exposure of active metabolite endoxifen. The objective of this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was to prospectively evaluate whether genotype-guided tamoxifen dosing in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2020-02, Vol.38 (6), p.558-566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In patients taking tamoxifen, the
genotype causes different exposure of active metabolite endoxifen. The objective of this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was to prospectively evaluate whether
genotype-guided tamoxifen dosing in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer could have an impact on the clinical outcome.
Patients who needed first-line tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. Based on individual
genotype, patients heterozygous (wild type [wt]/variant [V]) or homozygous (V/V) for variant alleles of decreased or no function were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen at an increased dose (ID arm; 40 mg daily) or regular dose (RD arm; 20 mg daily), and patients homozygous for wild-type alleles (wt/wt) received tamoxifen at 20 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints included PFS and correlation of Z-endoxifen concentration with clinical outcomes.
Between December 2012 and July 2016, 186 patients were enrolled in Japan. Of 184 evaluable patients, 136 carried wt/V or V/V (ID arm, 70; RD arm, 66), and 48 carried wt/wt. PFS rates at 6 months were not significantly different between the ID and RD arms (67.6%
66.7%). The serum trough concentrations of Z-endoxifen in the ID arm were significantly higher than those in the RD arm (median, 89.2 nM
51.1 nM;
< .0001) and were also higher compared with wt/wt patients (72.0 nM;
= .045). No significant difference in Z-endoxifen concentrations was observed between patients with disease progression and those who were progression free at 6 months (
= .43).
In patients with
-variant alleles, increasing tamoxifen dosing did not achieve a higher PFS rate at 6 months. The
genotype solely cannot explain individual variability in the efficacy of tamoxifen. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1200/JCO.19.01412 |