Patient Perspectives on Addressing Social Needs in Primary Care Using a Screening and Resource Referral Intervention

Background Interest is growing in interventions to address social needs in clinical settings. However, little is known about patients’ perceptions and experiences with these interventions. Objective To evaluate patients’ experiences and patient-reported outcomes of a primary care-based intervention...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2020-02, Vol.35 (2), p.481-489
Hauptverfasser: Hsu, Clarissa, Cruz, Stephanie, Placzek, Hilary, Chapdelaine, Michelle, Levin, Sara, Gutierrez, Fabiola, Standish, Sara, Maki, Ian, Carl, Mary, Orantes, Miriam Rosa, Newman, Duffy, Cheadle, Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Interest is growing in interventions to address social needs in clinical settings. However, little is known about patients’ perceptions and experiences with these interventions. Objective To evaluate patients’ experiences and patient-reported outcomes of a primary care-based intervention to help patients connect with community resources using trained volunteer advocates. Design Qualitative telephone interviews with patients who had worked with the volunteer advocates. Sample and recruitment targets were equally distributed between patients who had at least one reported success in meeting an identified need and those who had no reported needs met, based on the database used to document patient encounters. Participants One hundred two patients. Interventions Patients at the study clinic were periodically screened for social needs. If needs were identified, they were referred to a trained volunteer advocate who further assessed their needs, provided them with resource referrals, and followed up with them on whether their need was met. Approach Thematic analysis was used to code the data. Key Results Interviewed patients appreciated the services offered, especially the follow-up. Patients’ ability to access the resource to which they were referred was enhanced by assistance with filling out forms, calling community resources, and other types of navigation. Patients also reported that interacting with the advocates made them feel listened to and cared for, which they perceived as noteworthy in their lives. Conclusions This patient-reported information provides key insights into a human-centered intervention in a clinical environment. Our findings highlight what works in clinical interventions addressing social needs and provide outcomes that are difficult to measure using existing quantitative metrics. Patients experienced the intervention as a therapeutic relationship/working alliance, a type of care that correlates with positive outcomes such as treatment adherence and quality of life. These insights will help design more patient-centered approaches to providing holistic patient care.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-05397-6