Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors

Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well established as prediction errors. However, the central tenet of temporal difference accounts—that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors—remains untested. In the present communication we addressed this by showing that op...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature neuroscience 2020-02, Vol.23 (2), p.176-178
Hauptverfasser: Maes, Etienne J. P, Sharpe, Melissa J., Usypchuk, Alexandra A., Lozzi, Megan, Chang, Chun Yun, Gardner, Matthew P. H., Schoenbaum, Geoffrey, Iordanova, Mihaela D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well established as prediction errors. However, the central tenet of temporal difference accounts—that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors—remains untested. In the present communication we addressed this by showing that optogenetically shunting dopamine activity at the start of a reward-predicting cue prevents second-order conditioning without affecting blocking. These results indicate that cue-evoked transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions. Maes et al. use second-order conditioning, blocking and optogenetic inhibition to show that cue-evoked dopamine transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions.
ISSN:1097-6256
1546-1726
DOI:10.1038/s41593-019-0574-1