Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields

Purpose Magnetic resonance guidance in proton therapy (MRPT) is expected to improve its current performance. The combination of magnetic fields with clinical proton beam lines poses several challenges for dosimetry, treatment planning and dose delivery. Proton beams are deflected by magnetic fields causing considerable changes in beam trajectories and also a retraction of the Bragg peak positions. A proper prediction and compensation of these effects is essential to ensure accurate dose calculations. This work aims to develop and benchmark a Monte Carlo (MC) beam model for dose calculation of MRPT for static magnetic fields up to 1 T. Methods Proton beam interactions with magnetic fields were simulated using the GATE/Geant4 toolkit. The transport of charged particle in custom 3D magnetic field maps was implemented for the first time in GATE. Validation experiments were done using a horizontal proton pencil beam scanning system with energies between 62.4 and 252.7 MeV and a large gap dipole magnet (B = 0–1 T), positioned at the isocenter and creating magnetic fields transverse to the beam direction. Dose was measured with Gafchromic EBT3 films within a homogeneous PMMA phantom without and with bone and tissue equivalent material slab inserts. Linear energy transfer (LET) quenching of EBT3 films was corrected using a linear model on dose‐averaged LET method to ensure a realistic dosimetric comparison between simulations and experiments. Planar dose distributions were measured with the films in two different configurations: parallel and transverse to the beam direction using single energy fields and spread‐out Bragg peaks. The MC model was benchmarked against lateral deflections and spot sizes in air of single beams measured with a Lynx PT detector, as well as dose distributions using EBT3 films. Experimental and calculated dose distributions were compared to test the accuracy of the model. Results Measured proton beam deflections in air at distances of 465, 665, and 1155 mm behind the isocenter after passing the magnetic field region agreed with MC‐predicted values within 4 mm. Differences between calculated and measured beam full width at half maximum (FWHM) were lower than 2 mm. For the homogeneous phantom, measured and simulated in‐depth dose profiles showed range and average dose differences below 0.2 mm and 1.2%, respectively. Simulated central beam positions and widths differed