Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses

To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149
Hauptverfasser: Mendel, R., Kissling, W., Reichhart, T., Bühner, M., Hamann, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 146
container_title Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences
container_volume 24
creator Mendel, R.
Kissling, W.
Reichhart, T.
Bühner, M.
Hamann, J.
description To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance. In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction. Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S2045796013000711
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S2045796013000711</cupid><sourcerecordid>3621326941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSH8AFReIAl4WxndjxBQlVFJCKemh7tib2ZOsqiRc7Ae2_r1ddVgXEyU-eb97M6DH2isN7Dlx_uBZQN9oo4BIANOfP2Mnua6WNNs8PWsExO8v5vjBQG2ilesGORS2L4uKE3X7HCdeU8tsqEbo5xClXc_yFyeeKxs0Qt0Sl6EN2Q8xLoir21SZv3V3AOQVXxVTlOOJcpA-4nmKm_JId9ThkOtu_p-z24vPN-dfV5dWXb-efLleuac28kiB7571wJEXTtNJoME7XioSpNUmSnUCsnewFdQ4MoKkdYO-94hy61shT9vHRd7N0I3lH05xwsJsURkxbGzHYPytTuLPr-NMqY1rO22Lwbm-Q4o-F8mzHcigNA04Ul2y5UlI1qm52s978hd7HJU3lvB0lpOGy0YXij5RLMedE_WEZDnaXm_0nt9Lz-ukVh47fKRVA7k1x7FLwa3oy-7-2Dzx_oxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662391357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><description>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance. In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction. Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2045796013000711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24308312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Disclosure ; Employment discrimination ; Mental disorders ; Original ; Original Articles</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2013 2013 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998118/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2045796013000711/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24308312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kissling, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichhart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bühner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><title>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><description>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance. In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction. Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</description><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><issn>2045-7960</issn><issn>2045-7979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSH8AFReIAl4WxndjxBQlVFJCKemh7tib2ZOsqiRc7Ae2_r1ddVgXEyU-eb97M6DH2isN7Dlx_uBZQN9oo4BIANOfP2Mnua6WNNs8PWsExO8v5vjBQG2ilesGORS2L4uKE3X7HCdeU8tsqEbo5xClXc_yFyeeKxs0Qt0Sl6EN2Q8xLoir21SZv3V3AOQVXxVTlOOJcpA-4nmKm_JId9ThkOtu_p-z24vPN-dfV5dWXb-efLleuac28kiB7571wJEXTtNJoME7XioSpNUmSnUCsnewFdQ4MoKkdYO-94hy61shT9vHRd7N0I3lH05xwsJsURkxbGzHYPytTuLPr-NMqY1rO22Lwbm-Q4o-F8mzHcigNA04Ul2y5UlI1qm52s978hd7HJU3lvB0lpOGy0YXij5RLMedE_WEZDnaXm_0nt9Lz-ukVh47fKRVA7k1x7FLwa3oy-7-2Dzx_oxE</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Mendel, R.</creator><creator>Kissling, W.</creator><creator>Reichhart, T.</creator><creator>Bühner, M.</creator><creator>Hamann, J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><author>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kissling, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichhart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bühner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendel, R.</au><au>Kissling, W.</au><au>Reichhart, T.</au><au>Bühner, M.</au><au>Hamann, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>146-149</pages><issn>2045-7960</issn><eissn>2045-7979</eissn><abstract>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance. In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction. Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>24308312</pmid><doi>10.1017/S2045796013000711</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7960
ispartof Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149
issn 2045-7960
2045-7979
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998118
source PubMed Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Disclosure
Employment discrimination
Mental disorders
Original
Original Articles
title Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managers'%20reactions%20towards%20employees'%20disclosure%20of%20psychiatric%20or%20somatic%20diagnoses&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20psychiatric%20sciences&rft.au=Mendel,%20R.&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=146-149&rft.issn=2045-7960&rft.eissn=2045-7979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2045796013000711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3621326941%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662391357&rft_id=info:pmid/24308312&rft_cupid=10_1017_S2045796013000711&rfr_iscdi=true