Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses
To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 149 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Mendel, R. Kissling, W. Reichhart, T. Bühner, M. Hamann, J. |
description | To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace.
Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance.
In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction.
Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S2045796013000711 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S2045796013000711</cupid><sourcerecordid>3621326941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSH8AFReIAl4WxndjxBQlVFJCKemh7tib2ZOsqiRc7Ae2_r1ddVgXEyU-eb97M6DH2isN7Dlx_uBZQN9oo4BIANOfP2Mnua6WNNs8PWsExO8v5vjBQG2ilesGORS2L4uKE3X7HCdeU8tsqEbo5xClXc_yFyeeKxs0Qt0Sl6EN2Q8xLoir21SZv3V3AOQVXxVTlOOJcpA-4nmKm_JId9ThkOtu_p-z24vPN-dfV5dWXb-efLleuac28kiB7571wJEXTtNJoME7XioSpNUmSnUCsnewFdQ4MoKkdYO-94hy61shT9vHRd7N0I3lH05xwsJsURkxbGzHYPytTuLPr-NMqY1rO22Lwbm-Q4o-F8mzHcigNA04Ul2y5UlI1qm52s978hd7HJU3lvB0lpOGy0YXij5RLMedE_WEZDnaXm_0nt9Lz-ukVh47fKRVA7k1x7FLwa3oy-7-2Dzx_oxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662391357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><description>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace.
Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance.
In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction.
Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2045796013000711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24308312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Disclosure ; Employment discrimination ; Mental disorders ; Original ; Original Articles</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2013 2013 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998118/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2045796013000711/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24308312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kissling, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichhart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bühner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><title>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><description>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace.
Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance.
In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction.
Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</description><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><issn>2045-7960</issn><issn>2045-7979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSH8AFReIAl4WxndjxBQlVFJCKemh7tib2ZOsqiRc7Ae2_r1ddVgXEyU-eb97M6DH2isN7Dlx_uBZQN9oo4BIANOfP2Mnua6WNNs8PWsExO8v5vjBQG2ilesGORS2L4uKE3X7HCdeU8tsqEbo5xClXc_yFyeeKxs0Qt0Sl6EN2Q8xLoir21SZv3V3AOQVXxVTlOOJcpA-4nmKm_JId9ThkOtu_p-z24vPN-dfV5dWXb-efLleuac28kiB7571wJEXTtNJoME7XioSpNUmSnUCsnewFdQ4MoKkdYO-94hy61shT9vHRd7N0I3lH05xwsJsURkxbGzHYPytTuLPr-NMqY1rO22Lwbm-Q4o-F8mzHcigNA04Ul2y5UlI1qm52s978hd7HJU3lvB0lpOGy0YXij5RLMedE_WEZDnaXm_0nt9Lz-ukVh47fKRVA7k1x7FLwa3oy-7-2Dzx_oxE</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Mendel, R.</creator><creator>Kissling, W.</creator><creator>Reichhart, T.</creator><creator>Bühner, M.</creator><creator>Hamann, J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</title><author>Mendel, R. ; Kissling, W. ; Reichhart, T. ; Bühner, M. ; Hamann, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-303fcdd2ce3255839709c746e2947e3e3b2aa4c3f2ebc090a94c0afdd6110b893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kissling, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichhart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bühner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendel, R.</au><au>Kissling, W.</au><au>Reichhart, T.</au><au>Bühner, M.</au><au>Hamann, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>146-149</pages><issn>2045-7960</issn><eissn>2045-7979</eissn><abstract>To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace.
Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance.
In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction.
Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>24308312</pmid><doi>10.1017/S2045796013000711</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7960 |
ispartof | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149 |
issn | 2045-7960 2045-7979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998118 |
source | PubMed Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Disclosure Employment discrimination Mental disorders Original Original Articles |
title | Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managers'%20reactions%20towards%20employees'%20disclosure%20of%20psychiatric%20or%20somatic%20diagnoses&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20psychiatric%20sciences&rft.au=Mendel,%20R.&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=146-149&rft.issn=2045-7960&rft.eissn=2045-7979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2045796013000711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3621326941%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662391357&rft_id=info:pmid/24308312&rft_cupid=10_1017_S2045796013000711&rfr_iscdi=true |