Managers' reactions towards employees' disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses

To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.146-149
Hauptverfasser: Mendel, R., Kissling, W., Reichhart, T., Bühner, M., Hamann, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To study whether employees who disclose a psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression risk stigmatisation and discrimination at the workplace. Randomised experimental study with 748 managers from German companies incorporating four case vignettes displaying an employee with different 'diagnoses' (depression, burnout, private crisis and thyroid dysfunction), but identical unspecific complaints. Main outcome measures were the managers' attitudes and their impact on stigmatisation with respect to job performance. In nearly all aspects of job performance, the diagnosis depression (psychiatric disorder) was seen as more critical than the diagnosis of a thyroid dysfunction (somatic disease). The diagnosis 'burnout' did not prove to be less stigmatising than 'depression'. Likewise 'private crisis' was rated less favourably than thyroid dysfunction. Therefore, employees have to evaluate if they disclose their psychiatric disorder or if they conceal it as a somatic illness.
ISSN:2045-7960
2045-7979
DOI:10.1017/S2045796013000711