Multicenter Evaluation of the New Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Piperacillin-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter baumannii Complex
Piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T) is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used in the hospital setting. Etest is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD) for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We conducted a multicenter eval...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-01, Vol.58 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T) is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used in the hospital setting. Etest is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD) for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We conducted a multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new P/T Etest compared to that of BMD following U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard ISO 20776-2 criteria using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) interpretive breakpoints, respectively. A total of 977 isolates (775
isolates, 119
isolates, and 83
complex isolates) were tested. Overall essential agreement (EA) was 96.4% and 96.6% for
when FDA and ISO 20776-2 criteria, respectively, were followed. EA was 98.3% for
and 91.6% for the
complex when both the FDA and ISO criteria were followed. Applying CLSI-FDA breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) reached 93.0%, 93.3%, and 89.2% for the
,
, and the
complex, respectively. Two very major errors (VMEs; 1.1%) were found among the
(for 2
isolates). No additional major errors (MEs) or VMEs were found. Applying EUCAST breakpoints, CA was 94.8% and 95.8% for
and
, respectively (no breakpoints are currently available for the
complex). No VMEs were observed among the
, but 2 (0.4%) MEs were found. Among the
isolates, 2 (6.9%) VMEs and 3 (3.3%) MEs were observed. These errors resulted when P/T Etest MICs were 1 doubling dilution apart from the BMD MICs. In conclusion, the new P/T Etest represents an accurate tool for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing of
,
, and
complex isolates with limited category errors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
DOI: | 10.1128/JCM.01042-19 |