Mechanistic actions of oxygen and methylxanthines on respiratory neural control and for the treatment of neonatal apnea

•Oxygen and caffeine are standard therapies for apnea of prematurity.•Both oxygen and caffeine have beneficial actions on both central and peripheral mechanisms of respiratory control.•The early use of these interventions on later development of the respiratory neural control system still remain unk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2020-02, Vol.273, p.103318-103318, Article 103318
Hauptverfasser: Mitchell, Lisa, MacFarlane, Peter M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Oxygen and caffeine are standard therapies for apnea of prematurity.•Both oxygen and caffeine have beneficial actions on both central and peripheral mechanisms of respiratory control.•The early use of these interventions on later development of the respiratory neural control system still remain unknown. Apnea remains one of the most concerning and prevalent respiratory disorders spanning all ages from infants (particularly those born preterm) to adults. Although the pathophysiological consequences of apnea are fairly well described, the neural mechanisms underlying the etiology of the different types of apnea (central, obstructive, and mixed) still remain incompletely understood. From a developmental perspective, however, research into the respiratory neural control system of immature animals has shed light on both central and peripheral neural pathways underlying apnea of prematurity (AOP), a highly prevalent respiratory disorder of preterm infants. Animal studies have also been fundamental in furthering our understanding of how clinical interventions (e.g. pharmacological and mechanical) exert their beneficial effects in the clinical treatment of apnea. Although current clinical interventions such as supplemental O2 and positive pressure respiratory support are critically important for the infant in respiratory distress, they are not fully effective and can also come with unfortunate, unintended (and long-term) side-effects. In this review, we have chosen AOP as one of the most common clinical scenarios involving apnea to highlight the mechanistic basis behind how some of the interventions could be both beneficial and also deleterious to the respiratory neural control system. We have included a section on infants with critical congenital heart diseases (CCHD), in whom apnea can be a clinical concern due to treatment with prostaglandin, and who may benefit from some of the treatments used for AOP.
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2019.103318