The Psychoactive Surveillance Consortium and Analysis Network (PSCAN): the first year
Background and aims The Psychoactive Surveillance Consortium and Analysis Network (PSCAN) is a national network of academic emergency departments (ED), analytical toxicologists and pharmacologists that collects clinical data paired with biological samples to identify and improve treatments of medica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2020-02, Vol.115 (2), p.270-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and aims
The Psychoactive Surveillance Consortium and Analysis Network (PSCAN) is a national network of academic emergency departments (ED), analytical toxicologists and pharmacologists that collects clinical data paired with biological samples to identify and improve treatments of medical conditions arising from use of new psychoactive substances (NPS). The aim of this study was to gather clinical data with paired drug identification from NPS users who presented to EDs within PSCAN during its first year (2016–17).
Design
Observational study involving patient records and biological samples.
Setting
Seven academic emergency medical centers across the United States.
Participants
ED patients (n = 127) > 8 years of age with possible NPS use who were identified and enrolled in PSCAN by clinical providers or research personnel.
Measurements
Clinical signs, symptoms and treatments were ed from the patients' health records. Biological samples were collected from leftover urine, serum and whole blood. Biological and drug samples, when available, were tested for drugs and drug metabolites via liquid chromatography–quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (LC‐QTOF/MS).
Findings
Patients in whom synthetic opioids were detected (n = 9) showed higher rates of intubation (four of nine), impaired mental status (four of nine) and respiratory acidosis (five of nine) compared with the rest of the cohort (nine of 118, P‐value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
DOI: | 10.1111/add.14808 |