Interlimb differences in parameters of aerobic function and local profiles of deoxygenation during double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycling

It is typically assumed that in the context of double-leg cycling, dominant (DOM ) and nondominant legs (NDOM ) have similar aerobic capacity and both contribute equally to the whole body physiological responses. However, there is a paucity of studies that have systematically investigated maximal an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2019-12, Vol.317 (6), p.R840-R851
Hauptverfasser: Iannetta, Danilo, Passfield, Louis, Qahtani, Ahmad, MacInnis, Martin J, Murias, Juan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is typically assumed that in the context of double-leg cycling, dominant (DOM ) and nondominant legs (NDOM ) have similar aerobic capacity and both contribute equally to the whole body physiological responses. However, there is a paucity of studies that have systematically investigated maximal and submaximal aerobic performance and characterized the profiles of local muscle deoxygenation in relation to leg dominance. Using counterweighted single-leg cycling, this study explored whether peak O consumption (V̇o ), maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS ), and profiles of local deoxygenation [HHb] would be different in the DOM compared with the NDOM . Twelve participants performed a series of double-leg and counterweighted single-leg DOM and NDOM ramp-exercise tests and 30-min constant-load trials. V̇o was greater in the DOM than in the NDOM (2.87 ± 0.42 vs. 2.70 ± 0.39 L/min, < 0.05). The difference in V̇o persisted even after accounting for lean mass ( < 0.05). Similarly, MLSS was greater in the DOM than in the NDOM (118 ± 31 vs. 109 ± 31 W; < 0.05). Furthermore, the amplitude of the [HHb] signal during ramp exercise was larger in the DOM than in the NDOM during both double-leg (26.0 ± 8.4 vs. 20.2 ± 8.8 µM, < 0.05) and counterweighted single-leg cycling (18.5 ± 7.9 vs. 14.9 ± 7.5 µM, < 0.05). Additionally, the amplitudes of the [HHb] signal were highly to moderately correlated with the mode-specific V̇o values (ranging from 0.91 to 0.54). These findings showed in a group of young men that maximal and submaximal aerobic capacities were greater in the DOM than in the NDOM and that superior peripheral adaptations of the DOM may underpin these differences. It is typically assumed that the dominant and nondominant legs contribute equally to the whole physiological responses. In this study, we found that the dominant leg achieved greater peak O uptake values, sustained greater power output while preserving whole body metabolic stability, and showed larger amplitudes of deoxygenation responses. These findings highlight heterogeneous aerobic capacities of the lower limbs, which have important implications when whole body physiological responses are examined.
ISSN:0363-6119
1522-1490
DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.00164.2019