Prevalence and Impact of Having Multiple Barriers to Medication Adherence in Non-adherent Patients with Poorly-controlled Cardiometabolic Disease
Adherence to medications remains poor despite numerous efforts to identify and intervene upon non-adherence. One potential explanation is the limited focus of many interventions on one barrier. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of having multiple barriers in contemporary practice. Our...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2019-11, Vol.125 (3), p.376-382 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Adherence to medications remains poor despite numerous efforts to
identify and intervene upon non-adherence. One potential explanation is the
limited focus of many interventions on one barrier. Little is known about the
prevalence and impact of having multiple barriers in contemporary practice. Our
objective was to quantify adherence barriers for patients with poorly-controlled
cardiometabolic condition, identify patient characteristics associated with
having multiple barriers, and determine its impact on adherence. We used a
linked electronic health records and insurer claims dataset from a large health
system from a recent pragmatic trial. Barriers to medication-taking before the
start of the intervention were elicited by clinical pharmacists using structured
interviews. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to examine
the association between patient factors and multiple barriers and multivariable
linear regression to evaluate the relationship between multiple barriers and
claims-based adherence. Of the 1,069 patients (mean: 61 years of age) in this
study, 25.1% had multiple barriers to adherence; the most common co-occurring
barriers were forgetfulness and health beliefs (31%, n=268). Patients with
multiple barriers were more likely to be non-white (Relative Risk [RR]:1.57,
95%CI: 1.21-1.74), be single/unpartnered (RR:1.36, 95%CI: 1.06-1.74), use
tobacco (RR:1.54, 95%CI: 1.13-2.11), and have poor glycemic control (RR:1.77,
95%CI: 1.31-2.39) versus those with 0 or 1 barrier. Each additional barrier
worsened average adherence by 3.1% (95%CI: −4.6%, −1.5%). In
conclusion, >25% of non-adherent patients present with multiple barriers
to optimal use, leading to meaningful differences in adherence. These findings
should inform quality improvement interventions aimed at non-adherence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.043 |