Prevalence and Impact of Having Multiple Barriers to Medication Adherence in Non-adherent Patients with Poorly-controlled Cardiometabolic Disease

Adherence to medications remains poor despite numerous efforts to identify and intervene upon non-adherence. One potential explanation is the limited focus of many interventions on one barrier. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of having multiple barriers in contemporary practice. Our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2019-11, Vol.125 (3), p.376-382
Hauptverfasser: Lauffenburger, Julie Christine, Isaac, Thomas, Bhattacharya, Romit, Sequist, Thomas Dean, Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar, Choudhry, Niteesh Kumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Adherence to medications remains poor despite numerous efforts to identify and intervene upon non-adherence. One potential explanation is the limited focus of many interventions on one barrier. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of having multiple barriers in contemporary practice. Our objective was to quantify adherence barriers for patients with poorly-controlled cardiometabolic condition, identify patient characteristics associated with having multiple barriers, and determine its impact on adherence. We used a linked electronic health records and insurer claims dataset from a large health system from a recent pragmatic trial. Barriers to medication-taking before the start of the intervention were elicited by clinical pharmacists using structured interviews. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to examine the association between patient factors and multiple barriers and multivariable linear regression to evaluate the relationship between multiple barriers and claims-based adherence. Of the 1,069 patients (mean: 61 years of age) in this study, 25.1% had multiple barriers to adherence; the most common co-occurring barriers were forgetfulness and health beliefs (31%, n=268). Patients with multiple barriers were more likely to be non-white (Relative Risk [RR]:1.57, 95%CI: 1.21-1.74), be single/unpartnered (RR:1.36, 95%CI: 1.06-1.74), use tobacco (RR:1.54, 95%CI: 1.13-2.11), and have poor glycemic control (RR:1.77, 95%CI: 1.31-2.39) versus those with 0 or 1 barrier. Each additional barrier worsened average adherence by 3.1% (95%CI: −4.6%, −1.5%). In conclusion, >25% of non-adherent patients present with multiple barriers to optimal use, leading to meaningful differences in adherence. These findings should inform quality improvement interventions aimed at non-adherence.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.043