Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults

Background Colorectal resection through a midline laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure to treat various bowel conditions. The typical postoperative hospital stay after this operation is 6 to 10 days. The main factors hindering early recovery and discharge are thought to include post...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2019-10, Vol.2019 (10), p.CD012310-CD012310
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Sophie S, Ying, Andrew J, Affan, Eshan T, Kakala, Benedict F, Strippoli, Giovanni FM, Bullingham, Alan, Currow, Helen, Dunn, David W, Yeh, Zeigfeld Yu‐Ting
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Colorectal resection through a midline laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure to treat various bowel conditions. The typical postoperative hospital stay after this operation is 6 to 10 days. The main factors hindering early recovery and discharge are thought to include postoperative pain and delayed return of bowel function. Continuous infusion of a local anaesthetic into tissues surrounding the surgical incision via a multi‐lumen indwelling wound catheter placed by the surgeon prior to wound closure may reduce postoperative pain, opioid consumption, the time to return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults. Search methods We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase databases to January 2019 to identify trials relevant to this review. We also searched reference lists of relevant trials and reviews for eligible trials. Additionally, we searched two clinical trials registers for ongoing trials. Selection criteria We considered randomised controlled trials (including non‐standard designs) or quasi‐randomised controlled trials comparing continuous wound infusion of a local anaesthetic versus a placebo or a sham after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults. We did not compare continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion to other techniques, such as transverse abdominis plane block or thoracic epidural analgesia. We allowed non‐randomised analgesic co‐interventions carried out equally in the intervention and control groups. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently identified trials for inclusion and assessed their quality using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We extracted data using standardised forms, including pain at rest and on movement (10‐point scale), opioid consumption via a patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) system (mg morphine equivalent), postoperative opioid‐related adverse events, the time to rescue analgesia, the time to first flatus and to first bowel movement, the time to ambulation, the length of hospital stay, serious postoperative adverse events, and patient satisfaction. We quantitatively synthesised the data by meta‐analysis. We summarised and graded the certainty of the evidence for critical outcomes using the GRADEpro tool and created a 'Summary of findings' table. Main results This
ISSN:1465-1858
1465-1858
1469-493X
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012310.pub2