In Silico and Experimental Evaluation of Primer Sets for Species-Level Resolution of the Vaginal Microbiota Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequencing

V4 sequence reads clustered at 99% identity and assigned to operational taxonomic units using the 99% clustered, extended Greengenes database provided optimal species-level identification of vaginal bacteria. This method provided results similar to those obtained with DADA2 and/or using the SILVA da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infectious diseases 2019-01, Vol.219 (2), p.305-314
Hauptverfasser: Van Der Pol, William J, Kumar, Ranjit, Morrow, Casey D, Blanchard, Eugene E, Taylor, Christopher M, Martin, David H, Lefkowitz, Elliot J, Muzny, Christina A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:V4 sequence reads clustered at 99% identity and assigned to operational taxonomic units using the 99% clustered, extended Greengenes database provided optimal species-level identification of vaginal bacteria. This method provided results similar to those obtained with DADA2 and/or using the SILVA database. Abstract Background Identification of bacteria in human vaginal specimens is commonly performed using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. However, studies utilize different 16S primer sets, sequence databases, and parameters for sample and database clustering. Our goal was to assess the ability of these methods to detect common species of vaginal bacteria. Methods We performed an in silico analysis of 16S rRNA gene primer sets, targeting different hypervariable regions. Using vaginal samples from women with bacterial vaginosis, we sequenced 16S genes using the V1–V3, V3–V4, and V4 primer sets. For analysis, we used an extended Greengenes database including 16S gene sequences from vaginal bacteria not already present. We compared results with those obtained using the SILVA 16S database. Using multiple database and sample clustering parameters, each primer set’s ability to detect common vaginal bacteria at the species level was determined. We also compared these methods to the use of DADA2 for denoising and clustering of sequence reads. Results V4 sequence reads clustered at 99% identity and using the 99% clustered, extended Greengenes database provided optimal species-level identification of vaginal bacteria. Conclusions This study is a first step toward standardizing methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of vaginal microbiome data.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiy508