QT/RR Relationship in Patients after Remote Anterior Myocardial Infarction with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Different Types of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Background: QT/RR relationship was found to be both rate‐dependent and rate‐independent, what suggests the influence of autonomic drive and other not‐autonomic related factors on it. The steeper QT/RR slope in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) was described, but the relationship to ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. The purpose of this study was to calculate differences in QT/RR relationship in patients after remote anterior MI with left ventricular dysfunction and different types of ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The cohort of 95 patients (age: 63 ± 11 years, LVEF: 35 ± 9%) with previous anterior MI (mean 1.1 years) was divided into two well‐matched groups—50 patients without episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (NoVT/VF: 39 males, 64 ± 12 years, LVEF 37 ± 8%) and 45 patients with VT and/or VF (all with ICD implanted) (VT/VF: 35 males, 62 ± 10 years, LVEF 34 ± 10%). No true antiarrhythmics were used. QT/RR slope was calculated from 24‐hour Holter ECG for the entire recording (E), daytime (D) and nighttime (N) periods. Results: Groups did not differ in basic clinical data (age, LVEF, treatment). QT/RR slopes were steeper in VT/VF than in NoVT/VF group in all analyzed periods: E ‐ 0.195 ± 0.03 versus 0.15 ± 0.03 (P < 0.001), N – 0.190 ± 0.03 versus 0.138 ± 0.03 (P < 0.001) and D ‐ 0.200 ± 0.04 versus 0.152 ± 0.03 (P < 0.001). No significant day‐to‐night differences were found in both groups. Conclusions: Steeper QT/RR slope and complete lack of day‐to‐night differences in VT/VF patients show inappropriate QT adaptation to the heart rate changes. The prognostic significance of this parameter needs prospective studies.