Comparison between single and multi-locus approaches for specimen identification in Mytilus mussels
Mytilus mussels have been the object of much research given their sentinel role in coastal ecosystems and significant value as an aquaculture resource appreciated for both, its flavour and nutritional content. Some of the most-studied Mytilus species are M. edulis , M. galloprovincialis , M. chilens...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.19714-13, Article 19714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mytilus
mussels have been the object of much research given their sentinel role in coastal ecosystems and significant value as an aquaculture resource appreciated for both, its flavour and nutritional content. Some of the most-studied
Mytilus
species are
M. edulis
,
M. galloprovincialis
,
M. chilensis
and
M. trossulus
. As species identification based on morphological characteristics of
Mytilus
specimens is difficult, molecular markers are often used. Single-locus markers can give conflicting results when used independently; not all markers differentiate among all species, and the markers target genomic regions with different evolutionary histories. We evaluated the concordance between the PCR-RFLP markers most commonly-used for species identification in mussels within the
Mytilus
genus (
Me15-16
,
ITS
,
mac-1
,
16S rRNA
and
CO
I) when used alone (mono-locus approach) or together (multi-locus approach). In this study, multi-locus strategy outperformed the mono-locus methods, clearly identifying all four species and also showed similar specimen identification performance than a 49 SNPs panel. We hope that these findings will contribute to a better understanding of DNA marker-based analysis of
Mytilus
taxa. These results support the use of a multi-locus approach when studying this important marine resource, including research on food quality and safety, sustainable production and conservation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-019-55855-8 |