Radiographic assessment of contrast enhancement and T2/FLAIR mismatch sign in lower grade gliomas: correlation with molecular groups
Purpose With the updated World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 neuropathological diagnostic criteria, radiographic prognostic associations in lower-grade gliomas (LGG, WHO grade II and III) are undergoing re-evaluation. Methods We identified 316 LGG patients (151 grade II and 165 grade III) for a com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2019-01, Vol.141 (2), p.327-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
With the updated World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 neuropathological diagnostic criteria, radiographic prognostic associations in lower-grade gliomas (LGG, WHO grade II and III) are undergoing re-evaluation.
Methods
We identified 316 LGG patients (151 grade II and 165 grade III) for a combined cohort from three independent databases. We analyzed the preoperative axial FLAIR, axial T2-weighted and post-gadolinium volumetric T1-weighted MR images. The molecular data collected included the status of
IDH1
/
2, TP53, TERT
promoter and
ATRX
mutations, in addition to 1p/19q co-deletions. In a subset of cases (n = 133), we assessed the “T2-FLAIR mismatch” sign.
Results
Gliomas were assigned to one of the three molecular groups: Group O (
IDH
-mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendrogliomas, n = 95), Group A (
IDH
-mutant,
ATRX
inactivated astrocytomas, n = 175) and Group G (
IDH
wild-type, GBM-like, n = 46). A contrast-enhancing tumor was seen in 98 patients (31%), most frequently in Group G (n = 28/45, 57%), when compared to Group A (n = 49/175, 28%) and Group O (n = 24/95, 25.3%) tumors (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0011, respectively). Consistent with previous reports, T2-FLAIR mismatch was preferentially found in Group A tumors (73.1%, 60 of 82), although its presence was not associated with survival, after controlling for molecular group. False positive mismatch sign was noted in 28.5% (12/42) Group O tumors, but none of the tumors in Group G. A combination of all three factors: age under 40 years at first diagnosis, a tumor size larger than 6 cm and T2-FLAIR mismatch was highly specific for
IDH
mutant astrocytoma (Group A).
Conclusion
We identify radiographic correlates of molecular groups in lower-grade gliomas, which join clinical demographic features in defining the characteristic presentation of these tumors. Radiographic correlates of prognosis in LGG require re-evaluation within molecular group. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11060-018-03034-6 |