Evaluation of the accuracy of urine analyzers in dogs and cats

The accuracy of urine analyzers used for dogs and cats has remained uncertain. This study examines the agreement between results of urine analysis obtained using two devices marketed for animals and for humans and the results of quantitative biochemical analysis. The degrees of concordance for bilir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2019, Vol.81(11), pp.1671-1675
Hauptverfasser: MIE, Keiichiro, HAYASHI, Akiyoshi, NISHIDA, Hidetaka, OKAMOTO, Mari, YASUDA, Kazuo, NAKATA, Mio, FUKATSU, Kazuyuki, MATSUNAMI, Norie, YAMASHITA, Shogo, OHASHI, Fumihito, AKIYOSHI, Hideo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The accuracy of urine analyzers used for dogs and cats has remained uncertain. This study examines the agreement between results of urine analysis obtained using two devices marketed for animals and for humans and the results of quantitative biochemical analysis. The degrees of concordance for bilirubin and ketones in the same category were ~80%, but for pH these were only ~60% in dogs and cats. Degrees of concordance for protein and the UP/C ratio clearly differed between the devices for animals and humans. We found that values for bilirubin and ketones obtained using urine analyzers may be reliable, but pH is unlikely to be accurate enough to be clinically useful for dogs and cats.
ISSN:0916-7250
1347-7439
DOI:10.1292/jvms.18-0468