Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma

Achieving and maintaining a high-quality response is the treatment goal for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM2012 study, in 458 patients aged ≤65 years with NDMM, is evaluating bortezomib (subcutaneous) + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRD) for 6 cycles fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2019-10, Vol.134 (16), p.1337-1345
Hauptverfasser: Rosiñol, Laura, Oriol, Albert, Rios, Rafael, Sureda, Anna, Blanchard, María Jesús, Hernández, Miguel Teodoro, Martínez-Martínez, Rafael, Moraleda, Jose M., Jarque, Isidro, Bargay, Juan, Gironella, Mercedes, de Arriba, Felipe, Palomera, Luis, González-Montes, Yolanda, Martí, Josep M., Krsnik, Isabel, Arguiñano, Jose M., González, Maria Esther, González, Ana Pilar, Casado, Luis Felipe, López-Anglada, Lucia, Paiva, Bruno, Mateos, Maria-Victoria, San Miguel, Jesus F., Lahuerta, Juan-José, Bladé, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Achieving and maintaining a high-quality response is the treatment goal for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM2012 study, in 458 patients aged ≤65 years with NDMM, is evaluating bortezomib (subcutaneous) + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRD) for 6 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) conditioned with IV busulfan + melphalan vs melphalan and posttransplant consolidation with 2 cycles of VRD. We present grouped response analysis of induction, transplant, and consolidation. Responses deepened over time; in patients who initiated cycle 6 of induction (n = 426), the rates of a very good partial response or better were 55.6% by cycle 3, 63.8% by cycle 4, 68.3% by cycle 5, and 70.4% after induction. The complete response rate of 33.4% after induction in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which was similar in the 92 patients with high-risk cytogenetics (34.8%), also deepened with further treatment (44.1% after ASCT and 50.2% after consolidation). Rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (median 3 × 10−6 sensitivity) in the ITT population also increased from induction (28.8%) to transplant (42.1%) and consolidation (45.2%). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events during induction were neutropenia (12.9%) and infection (9.2%). Grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (grouped term) during induction was 17.0%, with a low frequency of grade 3 (3.7%) and grade 4 (0.2%) events. VRD is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for induction in NDMM with deepening response throughout induction and over the course of treatment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01916252 and EudraCT as #2012-005683-10. •VRD was effective and well tolerated before ASCT; 33.4% complete response/28.8% minimal residual disease–negative after 6 induction cycles.•Responses deepened with VRD throughout induction and over the course of treatment with few discontinuations due to toxicity. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.2019000241