The effects of low-dose ketamine on the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled study

Background Low‐dose ketamine has been found to have robust and rapid antidepressant effects. A hypoactive prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a hyperactive amygdala have been suggested to be associated with treatment‐resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the rapid antidepressant mechani...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human brain mapping 2016-03, Vol.37 (3), p.1080-1090
Hauptverfasser: Li, Cheng-Ta, Chen, Mu-Hong, Lin, Wei-Chen, Hong, Chen-Jee, Yang, Bang-Hung, Liu, Ren-Shyan, Tu, Pei-Chi, Su, Tung-Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Low‐dose ketamine has been found to have robust and rapid antidepressant effects. A hypoactive prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a hyperactive amygdala have been suggested to be associated with treatment‐resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the rapid antidepressant mechanisms of ketamine on TRD involve changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC and the amygdala. Methods A group of 48 TRD patients were recruited and equally randomized into three groups (A: 0.5 kg/mg‐ketamine; B: 0.2 kg/mg‐ketamine; and C: normal saline [NS]). Standardized uptake values (SUV) of glucose metabolism measured by 18F‐FDG positron‐emission‐tomography before and immediately after a 40‐min ketamine or NS infusion were used for subsequent region‐of‐interest (ROI) analyses (a priori regions: PFC and amygdala) and whole‐brain voxel‐wise analyses and were correlated with antidepressant responses, as defined by the Hamilton depression rating scale score. The 18F‐FDG signals were used as a proxy measure of glutamate neurotransmission. Results The ROI analysis indicated that Group A and Group B, but not Group C, had increases in the SUV of the PFC (group‐by‐time interaction: F = 7.373, P = 0.002), whereas decreases in the SUV of the amygdala were observed in all three groups (main effect of time, P 
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.23085