CT pattern of Infarct location and not infarct volume determines outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

Malignant middle cerebral artery [MMCA] infarction has a different topographic distribution that might confound the relationship between lesion volume and outcome. Retrospective study to determine the multivariable relationship between computerized tomographic [CT] infarct location, volume and outco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2019-11, Vol.9 (1), p.17090-7, Article 17090
Hauptverfasser: Kamran, Saadat, Akhtar, Naveed, Salam, Abdul, Alboudi, Ayman, Kamran, Kainat, Imam, Yahiya Bashir, Amir, Numan, Ali, Musab, Haroon, Khawaja Hasan, Muhammad, Ahmad, Ahmad, Arsalan, Ayyad, Ali, Elalamy, Osama, Inshasi, Jihad, Shuaib, Ashfaq
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Malignant middle cerebral artery [MMCA] infarction has a different topographic distribution that might confound the relationship between lesion volume and outcome. Retrospective study to determine the multivariable relationship between computerized tomographic [CT] infarct location, volume and outcomes in decompressive hemicraniectomy [DHC] for MMCA infarction. The MCA infarctions were classified into four subgroups by CT, subtotal, complete MCA [co-MCA], Subtotal MCA with additional infarction [Subtotal MCAAI] and co-MCA with additional infarction [Co-MCAAI]. Maximum infarct volume [MIV] was measured on the pre-operative CT. Functional outcome was measured by the modified Rankin Scale [mRS] dichotomized as favourable 0–3 and unfavourable ≥4, at three months. In 137 patients, from least favourable to favourable outcome were co-MCAAI, subtotal MCAAI, co-MCA and subtotal MCA infarction. Co-MCAAI had the worst outcome, 56/57 patients with additional infarction had mRS ≥ 4. Multiple comparisons Scheffe test showed no significant difference in MIV of subtotal infarction , co-MCA, Subtotal MCAAI but the outcome was significantly different. Multivariate analysis confirmed MCAAI [7.027 (2.56–19.28), p = 0.000] as the most significant predictor of poor outcomes whereas MIV was not significant [OR, 0.99 (0.99–01.00), p = 0.594]. Other significant independent predictors were age ≥ 55 years 12.14 (2.60–56.02), p = 0.001 and uncal herniation 4.98(1.53–16.19), p = 0.007]. Our data shows the contribution of CT infarction location in determining the functional outcome after DHC. Subgroups of patients undergoing DHC had different outcomes despite comparable infarction volumes.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-53556-w