Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments

Summary Background Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping. Objectives To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea. Methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing tri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2019-07, Vol.181 (1), p.65-79
Hauptverfasser: Zuuren, E.J., Fedorowicz, Z., Tan, J., Linden, M.M.D., Arents, B.W.M., Carter, B., Charland, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping. Objectives To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea. Methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing trials registers (March 2018) for randomized controlled trials. Study selection, data extraction, risk‐of‐bias assessment and analyses were carried out independently by two authors. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence. Results We included 152 studies (46 were new), comprising 20 944 participants. Topical interventions included brimonidine, oxymetazoline, metronidazole, azelaic acid, ivermectin and other topical treatments. Systemic interventions included oral antibiotics, combinations with topical treatments or other systemic treatments. Several studies evaluated laser or light‐based treatment. We present the most current evidence for rosacea management based on a phenotype‐led approach. Conclusions For reducing temporarily persistent erythema there was high‐certainty evidence for topical brimonidine and moderate certainty for topical oxymetazoline; for erythema and mainly telangiectasia there was low‐to‐moderate‐certainty evidence for laser and intense pulsed light therapy. For reducing papules/pustules there was high‐certainty evidence for topical azelaic acid and topical ivermectin; moderate‐to‐high‐certainty evidence for doxycycline 40 mg modified release (MR) and isotretinoin; and moderate‐certainty evidence for topical metronidazole, and topical minocycline and oral minocycline being equally effective as doxycycline 40 mg MR. There was low‐certainty evidence for tetracycline and low‐dose minocycline. For ocular rosacea, there was moderate‐certainty evidence that oral omega‐3 fatty acids were effective and low‐certainty evidence for ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion and doxycycline. What's already known about this topic? Rosacea is a chronic facial inflammatory dermatosis. The diagnosis and classification of rosacea have evolved from a subtype approach to a phenotype approach. Effective and safe interventions include brimonidine in temporarily reducing persistent erythema; laser‐ and light‐based therapies for mainly telangiectasia; topical azelaic acid, metronidazole and ivermectin, along with oral doxycycline and isotretinoin, for papules/pustules; and topical ciclosporin ophthalmi
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.17590